A Comparative Study On Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Autogenic Inhibition Technique On Pain Intensity And Function In Subjects With Mechanical Neck Pain

Background: Mechanical neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two manual therapy approaches Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Autogenic Inhibition Technique (AIT) in reducing pain intensity and improving functional ability in individuals with Mechanical Neck Pain. Methods: Quasi experimental study design was used, 80 subjects with age between 18 to 70 years having a clinical diagnosis of Mechanical Neck Pain were randomly allocated in to two groups. In Group A (n=40) subjects were treated with Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization whereas in Group B (n=40) subjects received with Autogenic Inhibition Technique. Participants were given intervention thrice a week for 4 weeks. The outcome measures of this intervention were measured in terms of Visual Analogue Scale for Pain, Universal Goniometer for Cervical Range of Motion and Neck Disability Index for Function. Results: Independent ‘t’ test was used to compare the mean significance difference between continuous variables. Paired ‘t’ test was used to assess the Statistical significance difference between Pre and Post test score. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that within the group comparison, both groups showed significant improvement in all parameters. Whereas, in between the group comparison, Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization showed better improvement compared to Autogenic Inhibition Technique. Conclusion: After 4 weeks of intervention both Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Autogenic Inhibition Techniques showed significant improvement on reducing Pain, improving Cervical Range of Motion and Function. However, Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization group were found to be more effective when compared to Autogenic Inhibition Technique. From the findings of the current study, Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization can be opted as a treatment of choice for the management of subjects with Mechanical Neck Pain.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.45710
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study On Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Autogenic Inhibition Technique On Pain Intensity And Function In Subjects With Mechanical Neck Pain

Patchava Apparao, R. Geetha Mounika, Kavalakuntla Priyanka, Devarapalli Dileep
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
article

A Comparative Study On Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Autogenic Inhibition Technique On Pain Intensity And Function In Subjects With Mechanical Neck Pain

Patchava Apparao, R. Geetha Mounika, Kavalakuntla Priyanka, Devarapalli Dileep
article en

Abstract

Background: Mechanical neck pain is a common musculoskeletal condition. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two manual therapy approaches Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Autogenic Inhibition Technique (AIT) in reducing pain intensity and improving functional ability in individuals with Mechanical Neck Pain. Methods: Quasi experimental study design was used, 80 subjects with age between 18 to 70 years having a clinical diagnosis of Mechanical Neck Pain were randomly allocated in to two groups. In Group A (n=40) subjects were treated with Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization whereas in Group B (n=40) subjects received with Autogenic Inhibition Technique. Participants were given intervention thrice a week for 4 weeks. The outcome measures of this intervention were measured in terms of Visual Analogue Scale for Pain, Universal Goniometer for Cervical Range of Motion and Neck Disability Index for Function. Results: Independent ‘t’ test was used to compare the mean significance difference between continuous variables. Paired ‘t’ test was used to assess the Statistical significance difference between Pre and Post test score. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that within the group comparison, both groups showed significant improvement in all parameters. Whereas, in between the group comparison, Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization showed better improvement compared to Autogenic Inhibition Technique. Conclusion: After 4 weeks of intervention both Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization and Autogenic Inhibition Techniques showed significant improvement on reducing Pain, improving Cervical Range of Motion and Function. However, Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization group were found to be more effective when compared to Autogenic Inhibition Technique. From the findings of the current study, Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization can be opted as a treatment of choice for the management of subjects with Mechanical Neck Pain.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Study On Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Versus Autogenic Inhibition Technique On Pain Intensity And Function In Subjects With Mechanical Neck Pain — Patchava Apparao, R. Geetha Mounika, et al. · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS