A tool for assessing sex/gender bias in epidemiological studies of occupational health: Pilot testing on studies of sedentary behaviour at the workplace and cardiometabolic health
The adapted checklist was applicable to assess the consideration of sex/gender in all studies. None of the primary studies considered sex/gender perspectives in all of the four categories. Further optimisation of the sex/gender tool seems warranted, based on further research on weighting individual categories or items and application of the checklist for occupational epidemiology in general.
Authors
- Ute Latza
- Karla Romero Starke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6614-2381)
- Janice Hegewald (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-161X)
- Michaela Prigge
- Andreas Seidler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8107-8971)
- Kathrin Reichel
- Eva Backé
Institutions
- Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (DE)
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PLoS ONE
- Published
- 2025-05-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324391
- Primary Topic
- Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00