The motivational foundations of childbearing: Investigating relationships between childbearing attitudes, value preferences, and parental bonding

This study aims to reveal the motivational foundations of childbearing. To achieve this goal, we investigated how general motivational goals expressed in personal value preferences and relationships with one's parents are connected to attitudes toward childbearing. The study is based on Schwartz's theory of values [1]. The study was conducted in Israel among young adults (age 18-35) with no children (n = 1122). Higher preferences for tradition and benevolence-care and lower preferences for self-direction and universalism-nature values were associated with positive childbearing attitudes among men and women. In addition, higher preferences for security-social values were associated with positive childbearing attitudes among men. Maternal bonding was associated with positive childbearing attitudes among men and women, and paternal bonding was associated with positive childbearing attitudes among men. High religiosity, high income, and low education were associated with positive childbearing attitudes among women. Among men, only the effect of religiosity was significant. No difference between men and women in childbearing attitudes was found. Personal value preferences partly mediated the effects of parental bonding and socio-demographic variables on childbearing attitudes. The obtained results advance our understanding of the psychological mechanisms of childbearing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324243
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The motivational foundations of childbearing: Investigating relationships between childbearing attitudes, value preferences, and parental bonding

Eugene Tartakovsky, Mor Mizrahi
4 citations
PLoS ONE
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
9.75
article

The motivational foundations of childbearing: Investigating relationships between childbearing attitudes, value preferences, and parental bonding

Eugene Tartakovsky, Mor Mizrahi
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the motivational foundations of childbearing. To achieve this goal, we investigated how general motivational goals expressed in personal value preferences and relationships with one's parents are connected to attitudes toward childbearing. The study is based on Schwartz's theory of values [1]. The study was conducted in Israel among young adults (age 18-35) with no children (n = 1122). Higher preferences for tradition and benevolence-care and lower preferences for self-direction and universalism-nature values were associated with positive childbearing attitudes among men and women. In addition, higher preferences for security-social values were associated with positive childbearing attitudes among men. Maternal bonding was associated with positive childbearing attitudes among men and women, and paternal bonding was associated with positive childbearing attitudes among men. High religiosity, high income, and low education were associated with positive childbearing attitudes among women. Among men, only the effect of religiosity was significant. No difference between men and women in childbearing attitudes was found. Personal value preferences partly mediated the effects of parental bonding and socio-demographic variables on childbearing attitudes. The obtained results advance our understanding of the psychological mechanisms of childbearing.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(5)
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Israel Science Foundation
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
9.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.