Locked In: Mobility, Market Tightness, and House Prices

Rising interest rates in 2022 significantly increased moving costs for homeowners with low fixed-rate mortgages, leading to a sharp drop in mobility. After accounting for biases from selective refinancing, we find mortgage rate "lock in"– the decline in moves due to the rising gap between market rates and homeowners' fixed rates– explains 44 percent of the drop in mortgage borrower mobility from 2021 to 2022. This effect primarily reflects fewer local moves, with only modest impacts on moves across labor market areas. Consistent with a housing search model, we show that under certain conditions, lock-in tightens markets, driving up house prices– an effect that increases with a market's initial tightness. The model also implies the effect of lock-in grows non-linearly in shock size. We estimate the 2022 lock-in shock reduced time on market by 29 percent and increased house prices by 8 percent. However, these effects were entirely due to historically tight initial housing market conditions. We show that in a more balanced housing market as in 2019, the same lock-in shock would have had little to no impact on prices or tightness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17016/feds.2024.088r1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Housing Market and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locked In: Mobility, Market Tightness, and House Prices

Therese C. Scharlemann, Aditya Aladangady, Jacob Krimmel
2 citations
Finance and Economics Discussion Series
Housing Market and Economics
6.26
article

Locked In: Mobility, Market Tightness, and House Prices

Therese C. Scharlemann, Aditya Aladangady, Jacob Krimmel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Rising interest rates in 2022 significantly increased moving costs for homeowners with low fixed-rate mortgages, leading to a sharp drop in mobility. After accounting for biases from selective refinancing, we find mortgage rate "lock in"– the decline in moves due to the rising gap between market rates and homeowners' fixed rates– explains 44 percent of the drop in mortgage borrower mobility from 2021 to 2022. This effect primarily reflects fewer local moves, with only modest impacts on moves across labor market areas. Consistent with a housing search model, we show that under certain conditions, lock-in tightens markets, driving up house prices– an effect that increases with a market's initial tightness. The model also implies the effect of lock-in grows non-linearly in shock size. We estimate the 2022 lock-in shock reduced time on market by 29 percent and increased house prices by 8 percent. However, these effects were entirely due to historically tight initial housing market conditions. We show that in a more balanced housing market as in 2019, the same lock-in shock would have had little to no impact on prices or tightness.

Finance and Economics Discussion Series
Federal Reserve (US), Federal Reserve Board of Governors (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Housing Market and Economics
6.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Locked In: Mobility, Market Tightness, and House Prices — Therese C. Scharlemann, Aditya Aladangady, et al. · Finance and Economics Discussion Series (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS