Assessing SAARC’s Diplomatic Performance: Crisis Management, Regional Cooperation, and Institutional Challenges in South Asia

This qualitative paper analyses the performance of SAARC diplomacy in view of regional and global upheavals, with special reference to its ability to manage political disputes, economic difficulties and social mistrust among the members. Based on content analysis of official SAARC documents, elite interviews, and academic literature, the study investigates how SAARC has managed diplomatic crises and advanced regional cooperation in the face of enduring obstacles, including bilateral disputes, geopolitical competition, and developmental discrepancies. The results indicate that while SAARC’s institutional mechanisms provide a forum for dialogue and the consensus building process, the organization’s diplomatic initiatives have frequently been hampered by political distrust and absence of monitoring mechanisms. At the same time, it also points out a few instances in which SAARC had contributed to confidence-building measures as well as conflict resolution processes and joint economic projects, which demonstrates its potential role as a regional stabilizer. The study also highlights the need for SAARC to strengthen its institutional infrastructure, cultivate more political will in its member countries, and adopt non-exclusive and more pragmatic diplomacy to control upheavals in the region. Finally, another related aspect that the contribution makes towards distilling the complex dynamics of regional diplomacy in South Asia while indicating future directions to reinforce the role of SAARC as an architect of peace, stability, and development.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2025(6-ii)26
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing SAARC’s Diplomatic Performance: Crisis Management, Regional Cooperation, and Institutional Challenges in South Asia

Annals of Human and Social Sciences
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
article

Assessing SAARC’s Diplomatic Performance: Crisis Management, Regional Cooperation, and Institutional Challenges in South Asia

article en

Abstract

This qualitative paper analyses the performance of SAARC diplomacy in view of regional and global upheavals, with special reference to its ability to manage political disputes, economic difficulties and social mistrust among the members. Based on content analysis of official SAARC documents, elite interviews, and academic literature, the study investigates how SAARC has managed diplomatic crises and advanced regional cooperation in the face of enduring obstacles, including bilateral disputes, geopolitical competition, and developmental discrepancies. The results indicate that while SAARC’s institutional mechanisms provide a forum for dialogue and the consensus building process, the organization’s diplomatic initiatives have frequently been hampered by political distrust and absence of monitoring mechanisms. At the same time, it also points out a few instances in which SAARC had contributed to confidence-building measures as well as conflict resolution processes and joint economic projects, which demonstrates its potential role as a regional stabilizer. The study also highlights the need for SAARC to strengthen its institutional infrastructure, cultivate more political will in its member countries, and adopt non-exclusive and more pragmatic diplomacy to control upheavals in the region. Finally, another related aspect that the contribution makes towards distilling the complex dynamics of regional diplomacy in South Asia while indicating future directions to reinforce the role of SAARC as an architect of peace, stability, and development.

Annals of Human and Social SciencesVol. 6(II)
University of Management and Technology (PK)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.