Glacier preservation doubled by limiting warming to 1.5°C versus 2.7°C

Glaciers adapt slowly to changing climatic conditions, with long-term implications for sea-level rise and water supply. Using eight glacier models, we simulated global glacier evolution over multicentennial timescales, allowing glaciers to equilibrate with climate under various constant global temperature scenarios. We estimate that glaciers globally will lose 39 (range, 15 to 55)% of their mass relative to 2020, corresponding to a global mean sea-level rise of 113 (range, 43 to 204) mm even if temperatures stabilized at present-day conditions. Under the +1.5°C Paris Agreement goal, more than twice as much global glacier mass remains at equilibration (53% versus 24%) compared with the warming level resulting from current policies (+2.7°C by 2100 above preindustrial). Our findings stress the need for stringent mitigation policies to ensure the long-term preservation of glaciers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu4675
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
28.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Glacier preservation doubled by limiting warming to 1.5°C versus 2.7°C

Koji Fujita, Samar Minallah, Walter Willem Immerzeel, Akiko Sakai et al.
22 citations
Science
Cryospheric studies and observations
28.62
article

Glacier preservation doubled by limiting warming to 1.5°C versus 2.7°C

Koji Fujita, Samar Minallah, Walter Willem Immerzeel, Akiko Sakai, Matthias Huss, Philip Kraaijenbrink, David R. Rounce, Tamsin Edwards, Loris Compagno, Daniel Farinotti, Regine Hock, Nicolas Champollion, Lilian Schuster, Gunter Leguy, Lander Van Tricht, Harry Zekollari, Megan James, William H. Lipscomb, Fabien Maussion, Ben Marzeion, Moritz Oberrauch
article en
22 citations

Abstract

Glaciers adapt slowly to changing climatic conditions, with long-term implications for sea-level rise and water supply. Using eight glacier models, we simulated global glacier evolution over multicentennial timescales, allowing glaciers to equilibrate with climate under various constant global temperature scenarios. We estimate that glaciers globally will lose 39 (range, 15 to 55)% of their mass relative to 2020, corresponding to a global mean sea-level rise of 113 (range, 43 to 204) mm even if temperatures stabilized at present-day conditions. Under the +1.5°C Paris Agreement goal, more than twice as much global glacier mass remains at equilibration (53% versus 24%) compared with the warming level resulting from current policies (+2.7°C by 2100 above preindustrial). Our findings stress the need for stringent mitigation policies to ensure the long-term preservation of glaciers.

ScienceVol. 388(6750)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Alaska Fairbanks (US), University of Fribourg (CH), University of Bremen (DE), King's College London (GB), University of Oslo (NO), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Utrecht University (NL), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), University of Bristol (GB), Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (FR), Swiss Re (Switzerland) (CH), Nagoya University (JP), Carnegie Mellon University (US), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, European Commission, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Norges Forskningsråd, Vlaamse regering, Universität Innsbruck
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cryospheric studies and observations
28.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.