Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models

Systematic monitoring of water quality parameters in aquatic environments was a critical task for environmental protection and water resource management. Remote sensing technology, as an effective monitoring tool, provided real-time water quality data. Currently, most research primarily relied on reflectance analysis of remote sensing data, often overlooking the impact of environmental factors on aquatic environments. This study integrated field data, multispectral imagery, meteorological data, and hydrological data to invert the water quality conditions of aquatic environments. A machine learning model (CNN-RF) was developed to estimate three water quality parameters (TP, DO, COD), and its performance was comprehensively evaluated using four error indices (R², MAE, MSE, MAPE). The results indicated that, compared to models using only spectral reflectance as features, the inclusion of environmental factors significantly enhanced the accuracy of the inversion of the three water quality parameters. For the watershed, the R² values for TP, DO, and COD increased by 0.34, 0.43, and 0.42, respectively. The MAE was less than 0.85, the RMSE was less than 1, and the MAEP was less than 15.65%. For the lake, the R² values for TP across four months were 0.75, 0.66, 0.67, and 0.73; for DO, they were 0.73, 0.79, 0.73, and 0.64; and for COD, they were 0.73, 0.62, 0.66, and 0.61, all exceeding 0.6. The MAE was less than 0.85, the RMSE was less than 0.95, and the MAEP was less than 12.6%. Both the watershed and lake models met the inversion requirements. Additionally, the SHAP method was employed to quantitatively analyze the contribution of environmental factors and spectral bands to the model inversion. Therefore, the findings confirmed the importance of environmental variables in water quality inversion and provided a theoretical basis for the optimization and application of future water quality monitoring systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2025.2509658
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.17
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models

Jinyu He, Mo Chen, Yanping Ma, Yubo Zhao
10 citations
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
8.17
article

Monitoring water quality parameters using multi-source data-driven machine learning models

Jinyu He, Mo Chen, Yanping Ma, Yubo Zhao
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Systematic monitoring of water quality parameters in aquatic environments was a critical task for environmental protection and water resource management. Remote sensing technology, as an effective monitoring tool, provided real-time water quality data. Currently, most research primarily relied on reflectance analysis of remote sensing data, often overlooking the impact of environmental factors on aquatic environments. This study integrated field data, multispectral imagery, meteorological data, and hydrological data to invert the water quality conditions of aquatic environments. A machine learning model (CNN-RF) was developed to estimate three water quality parameters (TP, DO, COD), and its performance was comprehensively evaluated using four error indices (R², MAE, MSE, MAPE). The results indicated that, compared to models using only spectral reflectance as features, the inclusion of environmental factors significantly enhanced the accuracy of the inversion of the three water quality parameters. For the watershed, the R² values for TP, DO, and COD increased by 0.34, 0.43, and 0.42, respectively. The MAE was less than 0.85, the RMSE was less than 1, and the MAEP was less than 15.65%. For the lake, the R² values for TP across four months were 0.75, 0.66, 0.67, and 0.73; for DO, they were 0.73, 0.79, 0.73, and 0.64; and for COD, they were 0.73, 0.62, 0.66, and 0.61, all exceeding 0.6. The MAE was less than 0.85, the RMSE was less than 0.95, and the MAEP was less than 12.6%. Both the watershed and lake models met the inversion requirements. Additionally, the SHAP method was employed to quantitatively analyze the contribution of environmental factors and spectral bands to the model inversion. Therefore, the findings confirmed the importance of environmental variables in water quality inversion and provided a theoretical basis for the optimization and application of future water quality monitoring systems.

Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid MechanicsVol. 19(1)
Heilongjiang University (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
8.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.