Evidence of the age-related positivity bias in autobiographical memories of the 2020 United States Presidential election outcome

<b>ABSTRACT</b>The current study examines the age-related positivity bias and the age-related positivity effect using a one-year longitudinal design with a sample that spans adulthood (<i>N</i> = 374; age range 19-90; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 47.41; <i>SD</i><sub>age </sub>= 16.75). Participants answered questions regarding their memories of learning about the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Results provide evidence for the positivity bias (i.e., a main effect of age) but no evidence of the positivity effect (i.e., an age x valence interaction). Increased age was associated with reporting feeling less negative at the time of the event, and also remembering feeling more positive (elated and happy) when reconstructing the event one year later. Depressive symptoms partially mediated the relationship between age and valence variables, indicating that depressive symptoms may partly explain the age-related positivity bias.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2025.2508446
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence of the age-related positivity bias in autobiographical memories of the 2020 United States Presidential election outcome

Francesca Falzarano, Neshat Yazdani, Karen L. Siedlecki, Jillian Minahan
1 links
Memory
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Evidence of the age-related positivity bias in autobiographical memories of the 2020 United States Presidential election outcome

Francesca Falzarano, Neshat Yazdani, Karen L. Siedlecki, Jillian Minahan
article en

Abstract

<b>ABSTRACT</b>The current study examines the age-related positivity bias and the age-related positivity effect using a one-year longitudinal design with a sample that spans adulthood (<i>N</i> = 374; age range 19-90; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 47.41; <i>SD</i><sub>age </sub>= 16.75). Participants answered questions regarding their memories of learning about the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Results provide evidence for the positivity bias (i.e., a main effect of age) but no evidence of the positivity effect (i.e., an age x valence interaction). Increased age was associated with reporting feeling less negative at the time of the event, and also remembering feeling more positive (elated and happy) when reconstructing the event one year later. Depressive symptoms partially mediated the relationship between age and valence variables, indicating that depressive symptoms may partly explain the age-related positivity bias.

MemoryVol. 33(6)
University of Southern California (US), Fordham University (US), California Southern University (US)
National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.