Evaluation of Workshops on Advance Care Planning for Healthy Individuals

目的:健康状態がよい時期に行うAdvance Care Planning(ACP)を推奨するWork shop(WS)が,「人生会議」を動機づけるかを明らかにする.方法:民生委員171名を対象に2回のWSを開催し,前後で4回(T1~T4)質問紙調査を行った.主要評価項目は「人生会議」実施率,副次的評価項目はACPの準備状態を測定するACP Engagement Survey日本語版 Japanese version of Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey(ACPES-J)および死生観尺度とし,介入前後(T1vsT4)で比較した.結果:分析対象は149名,実施率は38.3%であり,介入前の6%に比べ有意に上昇した(p<.001, w=.54).ACPES-Jの自己効力感,レディネス,Totalは有意に上昇したが(p<.001~.031, d=.29~.67),死生観は有意な変化を認めなかった.結論:WSは「人生会議」を動機づけることが示唆された.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Palliative Care Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2512/jspm.20.111
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Workshops on Advance Care Planning for Healthy Individuals

Tomoko Tamaki, Kimiko Nakamura, Anri Inumaru, Hiroki Funao et al.
Palliative Care Research
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Evaluation of Workshops on Advance Care Planning for Healthy Individuals

Tomoko Tamaki, Kimiko Nakamura, Anri Inumaru, Hiroki Funao, Mayumi Tsujikawa, Miwa Sakaguchi, Yoshiko Takeda
article en

Abstract

目的:健康状態がよい時期に行うAdvance Care Planning(ACP)を推奨するWork shop(WS)が,「人生会議」を動機づけるかを明らかにする.方法:民生委員171名を対象に2回のWSを開催し,前後で4回(T1~T4)質問紙調査を行った.主要評価項目は「人生会議」実施率,副次的評価項目はACPの準備状態を測定するACP Engagement Survey日本語版 Japanese version of Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey(ACPES-J)および死生観尺度とし,介入前後(T1vsT4)で比較した.結果:分析対象は149名,実施率は38.3%であり,介入前の6%に比べ有意に上昇した(p<.001, w=.54).ACPES-Jの自己効力感,レディネス,Totalは有意に上昇したが(p<.001~.031, d=.29~.67),死生観は有意な変化を認めなかった.結論:WSは「人生会議」を動機づけることが示唆された.

Palliative Care ResearchVol. 20(2)
Shiga University of Medical Science (JP), Suzuka University of Medical Science (JP), Mie University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.