The outcome of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma treated with doxorubicin-based (CHOP) and pirarubicin-based regimen (THP-COP) regimen: a single institution experience

This study investigates the outcomes of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) treated with a doxorubicin-based regimen (CHOP) and a pirarubicin-based regimen (THP-COP). Newly diagnosed patients with PTCL between 2001 and 2021 were classified by initial treatment, either CHOP or THP-COP regimen. The treatment response, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Overall, 65 patients were analyzed, with 41 classified into the CHOP group and 24 into the THP-COP group. Dose-intensified regimen was applied in 22 patients (53.7%) in the CHOP group and 16 (66.7%) in the THP-COP group. When stratified by treatment, the complete response (CR) rates in the CHOP group and the THP-COP group were 66% and 46% (P = 0.273), the 3-year EFS rates were 52.1% and 29.2% (P = 0.0492), and the 3-year OS rates were 72.7% and 48.6% (P = 0.0718), respectively. When stratified by treatment intensity, the CR rates in the dose-intensified group and the conventional dose group were 65% and 50% (P = 0.230), the 3-year EFS rates were 45.9% and 39.6% (P = 0.995), and the 3-year OS rates were 61.1% and 66.4% (P = 0.267), respectively. This study revealed no significant advantage of the THP-COP regimen over the CHOP regimen regarding treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed PTCLs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hematopathology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3960/jslrt.25010
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The outcome of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma treated with doxorubicin-based (CHOP) and pirarubicin-based regimen (THP-COP) regimen: a single institution experience

Katsuhiro Miura, Masaru Nakagawa, Kazuhide Iizuka, Takashi Hamada et al.
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hematopathology
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The outcome of patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma treated with doxorubicin-based (CHOP) and pirarubicin-based regimen (THP-COP) regimen: a single institution experience

Katsuhiro Miura, Masaru Nakagawa, Kazuhide Iizuka, Takashi Hamada, Hideki Nakamura, Noriyoshi Iriyama, Hiromichi Takahashi, Toshihide Endo, Shimon Otake, Takashi Koike, Kazuya Kurihara
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the outcomes of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) treated with a doxorubicin-based regimen (CHOP) and a pirarubicin-based regimen (THP-COP). Newly diagnosed patients with PTCL between 2001 and 2021 were classified by initial treatment, either CHOP or THP-COP regimen. The treatment response, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Overall, 65 patients were analyzed, with 41 classified into the CHOP group and 24 into the THP-COP group. Dose-intensified regimen was applied in 22 patients (53.7%) in the CHOP group and 16 (66.7%) in the THP-COP group. When stratified by treatment, the complete response (CR) rates in the CHOP group and the THP-COP group were 66% and 46% (P = 0.273), the 3-year EFS rates were 52.1% and 29.2% (P = 0.0492), and the 3-year OS rates were 72.7% and 48.6% (P = 0.0718), respectively. When stratified by treatment intensity, the CR rates in the dose-intensified group and the conventional dose group were 65% and 50% (P = 0.230), the 3-year EFS rates were 45.9% and 39.6% (P = 0.995), and the 3-year OS rates were 61.1% and 66.4% (P = 0.267), respectively. This study revealed no significant advantage of the THP-COP regimen over the CHOP regimen regarding treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed PTCLs.

Journal of Clinical and Experimental HematopathologyVol. 65(2)
Nihon University (JP), National Hospital Organization (JP), National Hospital Organization Saitama Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.