Transforming Critical Conversations

Research finds that engaging students in online deliberations requires three components: (1) designing a space specifically for deliberations, (2) a structured pattern that requires consistent interactions, and (3) a process guided by academically guided outcomes.Using these three components, deliberations become a routine where students share perspectives, listen, and provide feedback as they reflect and engage with peers.To assess deliberations, data was collected from an online collaboration across two geographically located universities.Significant evidence revealed that students deliberated with academic reflectivity, identifying, and challenging each other across the universities.And despite Covid-19, their online interactions were an invaluable method engaging them in academic inquiry-based deliberation.This study concludes that online peer interaction sustains and promotes critical thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Educators Online
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2025.22.3.5
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transforming Critical Conversations

Anita Chadha
The Journal of Educators Online
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Transforming Critical Conversations

Anita Chadha
article en

Abstract

Research finds that engaging students in online deliberations requires three components: (1) designing a space specifically for deliberations, (2) a structured pattern that requires consistent interactions, and (3) a process guided by academically guided outcomes.Using these three components, deliberations become a routine where students share perspectives, listen, and provide feedback as they reflect and engage with peers.To assess deliberations, data was collected from an online collaboration across two geographically located universities.Significant evidence revealed that students deliberated with academic reflectivity, identifying, and challenging each other across the universities.And despite Covid-19, their online interactions were an invaluable method engaging them in academic inquiry-based deliberation.This study concludes that online peer interaction sustains and promotes critical thinking.

The Journal of Educators OnlineVol. 22(3)
University of Houston - Downtown (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transforming Critical Conversations — Anita Chadha · The Journal of Educators Online (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS