How stable are multivariate findings about register variation across varieties of English? On the replicability of Geometric Multivariate Analysis

Abstract Registers reflect the constraints of systematically recurring situational contexts and are therefore embedded in the lingua-culture in which these situations occur. Consequently, when a language – such as English – is used in widely differing cultural contexts, the question arises whether registers in different varieties of the language might not actually reflect cultural differences between similar types of situations. Previous studies have shown that varieties of English fall into different clusters and that informal spoken texts in particular reflect differences between the varieties. With a focus on register variation across varieties of English, Neumann & Evert (2021) suggest that register-related patterns of variation are much more pronounced than differences between varieties. However, they also observe divergence between texts in the same register from different varieties. The generality of both findings is limited, though, because their analysis was based on only three varieties of English. Our paper aims at exploring these questions more thoroughly by drawing on a larger set of nine components of the International Corpus of English (ICE) preprocessed for comparability (Lehmann & Schneider 2012) and by focusing the interpretation on registers that are expected to be more strongly affected by cultural differences. To this end, we extract the same set of 41 lexico-grammatical features from the ICE components as Neumann & Evert (2021), building on the corpus queries made available in their online supplement. In three steps, we first reproduce the geometric multivariate analysis (GMA) of Neumann & Evert (2021) and then replicate it in two increasingly different approaches. These methodological variations allow us to explore to what extent the results of Neumann & Evert (2021) depended on their specific choice of three ICE components and how stable the results of the exploratory analysis with the chosen multivariate approach are.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ICAME journal
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2025-0003
Primary Topic
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How stable are multivariate findings about register variation across varieties of English? On the replicability of Geometric Multivariate Analysis

Stefan Evert, Gerold Schneider, Florian Frenken, Stella Neumann
ICAME journal
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
article

How stable are multivariate findings about register variation across varieties of English? On the replicability of Geometric Multivariate Analysis

Stefan Evert, Gerold Schneider, Florian Frenken, Stella Neumann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Registers reflect the constraints of systematically recurring situational contexts and are therefore embedded in the lingua-culture in which these situations occur. Consequently, when a language – such as English – is used in widely differing cultural contexts, the question arises whether registers in different varieties of the language might not actually reflect cultural differences between similar types of situations. Previous studies have shown that varieties of English fall into different clusters and that informal spoken texts in particular reflect differences between the varieties. With a focus on register variation across varieties of English, Neumann & Evert (2021) suggest that register-related patterns of variation are much more pronounced than differences between varieties. However, they also observe divergence between texts in the same register from different varieties. The generality of both findings is limited, though, because their analysis was based on only three varieties of English. Our paper aims at exploring these questions more thoroughly by drawing on a larger set of nine components of the International Corpus of English (ICE) preprocessed for comparability (Lehmann & Schneider 2012) and by focusing the interpretation on registers that are expected to be more strongly affected by cultural differences. To this end, we extract the same set of 41 lexico-grammatical features from the ICE components as Neumann & Evert (2021), building on the corpus queries made available in their online supplement. In three steps, we first reproduce the geometric multivariate analysis (GMA) of Neumann & Evert (2021) and then replicate it in two increasingly different approaches. These methodological variations allow us to explore to what extent the results of Neumann & Evert (2021) depended on their specific choice of three ICE components and how stable the results of the exploratory analysis with the chosen multivariate approach are.

ICAME journalVol. 49(1)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Zurich (CH), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Linguistic Variation and Morphology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.