Rethinking Hisbah and Sharia Proceduralism: A Comparative Approach to Justice in Contemporary Islamic Law

This study explores the impact of differences between the flexibility of the hisbah system in Islam and the procedural nature of the Syariah criminal enforcement system in Malaysia on the application of contemporary principles of justice. Using a qualitative approach, the research applies deductive content analysis based on primary and secondary sources, including classical Islamic legal texts, statutory laws, journal articles, books, and relevant websites. The data were analysed both descriptively and analytically, and the findings were presented thematically. To ensure data validity and reliability, the researcher used source triangulation. The findings reveal that contemporary justice principles—within the frameworks of hisbah and Syariah proceduralism in Malaysia—have not been applied comprehensively and holistically. Their implementation remains limited to specific areas and does not reflect a balanced integration of procedural, retributive, restorative, and distributive justice. While procedural justice appears to be better protected within the Syariah criminal enforcement system, this does not necessarily mean that justice is fully achieved, as gaps and inconsistencies still exist. In particular, retributive, restorative, and distributive justice require critical re-evaluation, as the procedural rigidity of the current system hinders their effective implementation—especially in terms of the severity and types of punishments imposed. In conclusion, this study highlights the need for reform in Malaysia’s Syariah legal framework. Such reforms may include codifying remand and raid procedures into procedural law, revising statutory sentencing limits, institutionalising restorative justice mechanisms, formally recognising mediation based on these principles, and introducing other necessary legal changes. This research contributes to strengthening the Syariah criminal justice system in Malaysia and promoting the more holistic application of justice principles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MILRev Metro Islamic Law Review
Published
2025-05-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10391
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Hisbah and Sharia Proceduralism: A Comparative Approach to Justice in Contemporary Islamic Law

Zaini Nasohah, Mohamad Ridhuan Mohd Zawawi, Anwar Fakhri Omar, Wafaa’ Yusof et al.
1 citations
MILRev Metro Islamic Law Review
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
3.91
article

Rethinking Hisbah and Sharia Proceduralism: A Comparative Approach to Justice in Contemporary Islamic Law

Zaini Nasohah, Mohamad Ridhuan Mohd Zawawi, Anwar Fakhri Omar, Wafaa’ Yusof, Safiyyah Hannah Souit
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explores the impact of differences between the flexibility of the hisbah system in Islam and the procedural nature of the Syariah criminal enforcement system in Malaysia on the application of contemporary principles of justice. Using a qualitative approach, the research applies deductive content analysis based on primary and secondary sources, including classical Islamic legal texts, statutory laws, journal articles, books, and relevant websites. The data were analysed both descriptively and analytically, and the findings were presented thematically. To ensure data validity and reliability, the researcher used source triangulation. The findings reveal that contemporary justice principles—within the frameworks of hisbah and Syariah proceduralism in Malaysia—have not been applied comprehensively and holistically. Their implementation remains limited to specific areas and does not reflect a balanced integration of procedural, retributive, restorative, and distributive justice. While procedural justice appears to be better protected within the Syariah criminal enforcement system, this does not necessarily mean that justice is fully achieved, as gaps and inconsistencies still exist. In particular, retributive, restorative, and distributive justice require critical re-evaluation, as the procedural rigidity of the current system hinders their effective implementation—especially in terms of the severity and types of punishments imposed. In conclusion, this study highlights the need for reform in Malaysia’s Syariah legal framework. Such reforms may include codifying remand and raid procedures into procedural law, revising statutory sentencing limits, institutionalising restorative justice mechanisms, formally recognising mediation based on these principles, and introducing other necessary legal changes. This research contributes to strengthening the Syariah criminal justice system in Malaysia and promoting the more holistic application of justice principles.

MILRev Metro Islamic Law ReviewVol. 4(1)
Al-Azhar University (EG), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.