Between Destiny and Curse: Theological Reform in Countering the Stigma of Disability in Islamic Discourse

This article aims to analyze and reform the theological understanding that has long associated disability with the stigma of a curse in Islamic discourse. The urgency of this research is based on the persistent negative perceptions of people with disabilities, leading to their marginalization and violation of their basic rights in society, including within Muslim communities. The prevailing narratives, both theological and cultural, often depict disability as a result of sin or a form of divine punishment, perpetuating discrimination and social exclusion. This research advocates for the establishment of a new, more inclusive and fair paradigm, aligned with the principles of justice and mercy in Islamic teachings. This study employs a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Primary data were collected from major religious sources, such as the Quran, Hadith, fatwas, and Islamic theological documents, while secondary data were gathered from academic literature, scholarly articles, and related books. Data collection techniques included literature review, analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana model, comprising data collection, data condensation, data display, and verification. Data validity was ensured through source triangulation to confirm the validity of findings. The results reveal three main findings: first, historical narratives of disability as a ‘curse’ have created a profound stigma that persists from ancient times to the contemporary era. Second, Quranic literature indicates that disability is not a form of punishment but rather part of the diversity of humanity recognized within the framework of divine justice. Third, the comparison between the narratives of curse and divine predestination affirms that Islamic theology fundamentally supports the social inclusion of people with disabilities. The discussion underscores the need for theological reform and strategic recommendations for educational institutions, clerics, and policymakers to build an inclusive and socially just Muslim society.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharos Journal of Theology
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.3037
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Destiny and Curse: Theological Reform in Countering the Stigma of Disability in Islamic Discourse

Salamuddin, Vanesia Amelia Sebayang
2 citations
Pharos Journal of Theology
Education and Islamic Studies
17.85
article

Between Destiny and Curse: Theological Reform in Countering the Stigma of Disability in Islamic Discourse

Salamuddin, Vanesia Amelia Sebayang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article aims to analyze and reform the theological understanding that has long associated disability with the stigma of a curse in Islamic discourse. The urgency of this research is based on the persistent negative perceptions of people with disabilities, leading to their marginalization and violation of their basic rights in society, including within Muslim communities. The prevailing narratives, both theological and cultural, often depict disability as a result of sin or a form of divine punishment, perpetuating discrimination and social exclusion. This research advocates for the establishment of a new, more inclusive and fair paradigm, aligned with the principles of justice and mercy in Islamic teachings. This study employs a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Primary data were collected from major religious sources, such as the Quran, Hadith, fatwas, and Islamic theological documents, while secondary data were gathered from academic literature, scholarly articles, and related books. Data collection techniques included literature review, analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana model, comprising data collection, data condensation, data display, and verification. Data validity was ensured through source triangulation to confirm the validity of findings. The results reveal three main findings: first, historical narratives of disability as a ‘curse’ have created a profound stigma that persists from ancient times to the contemporary era. Second, Quranic literature indicates that disability is not a form of punishment but rather part of the diversity of humanity recognized within the framework of divine justice. Third, the comparison between the narratives of curse and divine predestination affirms that Islamic theology fundamentally supports the social inclusion of people with disabilities. The discussion underscores the need for theological reform and strategic recommendations for educational institutions, clerics, and policymakers to build an inclusive and socially just Muslim society.

Pharos Journal of Theology(106.3)
Universitas Sumatera Utara (ID), Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Education and Islamic Studies
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.