Integrating Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches in Randomized Controlled Trials

Despite greater attention to the ethics of experimental research methods over the past several decades, randomized controlled trials still face criticism for at times engaging in extractive or exploitative practices in their implementation. In response, there are growing calls from the field to incorporate community engagement to enhance attention to equity and improve acceptability through culturally responsive research and evaluation practices. This systematic review focuses specifically on the integration of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) and related approaches in the experimental evaluation of thirty-six unique youth or family-focused interventions, described in sixty-nine articles spanning multiple disciplines. Results include summaries of study characteristics, commonly used strategies and approaches, and perceived strengths and challenges of the use of CBPR principles in randomized controlled trials. The findings highlight how CBPR can strengthen a study’s validity by integrating community voice and perspective at every stage of the evaluation process, helping address historical power imbalances and improving the utility of causal evidence. This review advocates for the expansion of CBPR approaches in experimental methods as a pathway to advance transformative social policy research that improves outcomes and reduces inequities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct20254919
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches in Randomized Controlled Trials

Wendy Castillo, Lindsay Dusard
1 links
Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Integrating Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches in Randomized Controlled Trials

Wendy Castillo, Lindsay Dusard
article en

Abstract

Despite greater attention to the ethics of experimental research methods over the past several decades, randomized controlled trials still face criticism for at times engaging in extractive or exploitative practices in their implementation. In response, there are growing calls from the field to incorporate community engagement to enhance attention to equity and improve acceptability through culturally responsive research and evaluation practices. This systematic review focuses specifically on the integration of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) and related approaches in the experimental evaluation of thirty-six unique youth or family-focused interventions, described in sixty-nine articles spanning multiple disciplines. Results include summaries of study characteristics, commonly used strategies and approaches, and perceived strengths and challenges of the use of CBPR principles in randomized controlled trials. The findings highlight how CBPR can strengthen a study’s validity by integrating community voice and perspective at every stage of the evaluation process, helping address historical power imbalances and improving the utility of causal evidence. This review advocates for the expansion of CBPR approaches in experimental methods as a pathway to advance transformative social policy research that improves outcomes and reduces inequities.

Inquiry Critical Thinking Across the DisciplinesVol. 34(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.