Intrinsic components in involution centralizers of fusion systems

This paper lays the foundation for the study of the saturated 2-fusion systems in which the centralizer of some fully centralized involution has a component whose center is nontrivial.The results in this paper are part of a program to, first, classify a large subclass of the class of simple 2-fusion systems of component type, and then, second, to use the theorem on fusion systems to simplify the proof of the theorem classifying the finite simple groups.See [4; 5] for a description of the program; there is also a bit of discussion of the program below.Let p be a prime and S a finite p-group.A fusion system on S is a category F whose objects are the subgroups of S and, for subgroups P, Q of S, the set hom F (P, Q) of morphisms from P to Q is a set of injective group homomorphisms from P to Q, and that set satisfies two weak axioms.The standard example is the fusion system F S (G) for G a finite group and S Syl p (G), whose morphisms are those induced via conjugation in G.A fusion system is saturated if it satisfies two more axioms easily seen to hold in the standard example using Sylow's theorem.See [12] for notation, terminology, and basic definitions and results on fusion systems.Let F be a saturated fusion system on a finite 2-group S. Proceeding by analogy with finite groups, one can define the notion of a normal subsystem of F, which can then be used to define the notions of simple and quasisimple systems, subnormal subsystems of F, and the set Comp(F) of components of F. For t an involution in S the centralizer C F (t) of t in F is defined, and if t is fully centralized (i.e.,Define C(F) to be the set of components of centralizers of involutions in F; that is, C C(F) if there exists some involution t S and a conjugate ( t, C) of (t, C) such that t is fully centralized and C Comp(C F ( t)); we write I(C) for the set of such involutions t.We say that F is of component type if C(F) is nonempty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacific Journal of Mathematics
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2025.336.7
Primary Topic
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intrinsic components in involution centralizers of fusion systems

Michael Aschbacher
Pacific Journal of Mathematics
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
article

Intrinsic components in involution centralizers of fusion systems

Michael Aschbacher
article en

Abstract

This paper lays the foundation for the study of the saturated 2-fusion systems in which the centralizer of some fully centralized involution has a component whose center is nontrivial.The results in this paper are part of a program to, first, classify a large subclass of the class of simple 2-fusion systems of component type, and then, second, to use the theorem on fusion systems to simplify the proof of the theorem classifying the finite simple groups.See [4; 5] for a description of the program; there is also a bit of discussion of the program below.Let p be a prime and S a finite p-group.A fusion system on S is a category F whose objects are the subgroups of S and, for subgroups P, Q of S, the set hom F (P, Q) of morphisms from P to Q is a set of injective group homomorphisms from P to Q, and that set satisfies two weak axioms.The standard example is the fusion system F S (G) for G a finite group and S Syl p (G), whose morphisms are those induced via conjugation in G.A fusion system is saturated if it satisfies two more axioms easily seen to hold in the standard example using Sylow's theorem.See [12] for notation, terminology, and basic definitions and results on fusion systems.Let F be a saturated fusion system on a finite 2-group S. Proceeding by analogy with finite groups, one can define the notion of a normal subsystem of F, which can then be used to define the notions of simple and quasisimple systems, subnormal subsystems of F, and the set Comp(F) of components of F. For t an involution in S the centralizer C F (t) of t in F is defined, and if t is fully centralized (i.e.,Define C(F) to be the set of components of centralizers of involutions in F; that is, C C(F) if there exists some involution t S and a conjugate ( t, C) of (t, C) such that t is fully centralized and C Comp(C F ( t)); we write I(C) for the set of such involutions t.We say that F is of component type if C(F) is nonempty.

Pacific Journal of MathematicsVol. 336(1-2)
California Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Advanced Algebra and Geometry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.