‘In Our Blood’: Archaeology and ‘Indigeneity’ in the British National Party’s Magazine <i>Identity</i>

This paper presents the first diachronic analysis of the appropriation of archaeological themes in British far-right politics, focusing on the British National Party’s publication Identity from 2000 to 2009. By examining how scientific archaeological data has been manipulated to promote racist politics, this research shows how archaeological expertise can be mobilized in service of what Fortier terms ‘genetic indigenisation’ (2011: 170). The study reveals continuities between the BNP’s rhetoric and contemporary far-right groups, particularly in the manipulation of archaeological and ancient DNA research. Set against the backdrop of recent anti-immigration protests and extremist violence in the UK in 2024, this research highlights archaeology’s vulnerability to misuse and challenges assumptions about anti-expert discourse in far-right spaces. This demonstrates that academic knowledge can be selectively assembled to support contemporary nationalist agendas. This paper contributes to broader a broader understanding of far-right exploitation of heritage and argues for greater scrutiny of archaeology's role in political discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Archaeology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14655187.2025.2505375
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Asian American and Pacific Histories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘In Our Blood’: Archaeology and ‘Indigeneity’ in the British National Party’s Magazine Identity

Lorna-Jane Richardson
1 citations
Public Archaeology
Asian American and Pacific Histories
4.29
article

‘In Our Blood’: Archaeology and ‘Indigeneity’ in the British National Party’s Magazine Identity

Lorna-Jane Richardson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the first diachronic analysis of the appropriation of archaeological themes in British far-right politics, focusing on the British National Party’s publication Identity from 2000 to 2009. By examining how scientific archaeological data has been manipulated to promote racist politics, this research shows how archaeological expertise can be mobilized in service of what Fortier terms ‘genetic indigenisation’ (2011: 170). The study reveals continuities between the BNP’s rhetoric and contemporary far-right groups, particularly in the manipulation of archaeological and ancient DNA research. Set against the backdrop of recent anti-immigration protests and extremist violence in the UK in 2024, this research highlights archaeology’s vulnerability to misuse and challenges assumptions about anti-expert discourse in far-right spaces. This demonstrates that academic knowledge can be selectively assembled to support contemporary nationalist agendas. This paper contributes to broader a broader understanding of far-right exploitation of heritage and argues for greater scrutiny of archaeology's role in political discourse.

Public ArchaeologyVol. 23(1-4)
University of East Anglia (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Asian American and Pacific Histories
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.