Defense mechanisms and their conceptualization in psychometric testing

This paper aims to demonstrate to what extent the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) fulfils the quality criteria of a psychometric test. This topic is controversially discussed in the current research and there is no consensus on the validity of the numerous existing instruments. Therefore, a systematic literature review of the DSQ was conducted. The factorial validity and internal consistency of the DSQ did not or only partially fulfil the criteria of a valid and reliable measurement instrument. The factors analysed in the form of the levels or scales of the DSQ could not be replicated or could only be partially replicated. The same applies to the analysis of reliability. The majority of studies have shown that the DSQ does not reflect the established psychometric properties of a quality instrument. This indicates a lack of content validity within the questionnaire and points out the need for a comprehensive review of existing theories on defense mechanisms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Psychology Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26648377.2025.v7.i1b.91
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychology of Development and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defense mechanisms and their conceptualization in psychometric testing

Lena Barth, Barbara Ruettner, Anett Mueller‐Alcazar, Maximilian Rischmüller
1 citations
International Journal of Psychology Sciences
Psychology of Development and Education
3.44
article

Defense mechanisms and their conceptualization in psychometric testing

Lena Barth, Barbara Ruettner, Anett Mueller‐Alcazar, Maximilian Rischmüller
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate to what extent the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) fulfils the quality criteria of a psychometric test. This topic is controversially discussed in the current research and there is no consensus on the validity of the numerous existing instruments. Therefore, a systematic literature review of the DSQ was conducted. The factorial validity and internal consistency of the DSQ did not or only partially fulfil the criteria of a valid and reliable measurement instrument. The factors analysed in the form of the levels or scales of the DSQ could not be replicated or could only be partially replicated. The same applies to the analysis of reliability. The majority of studies have shown that the DSQ does not reflect the established psychometric properties of a quality instrument. This indicates a lack of content validity within the questionnaire and points out the need for a comprehensive review of existing theories on defense mechanisms.

International Journal of Psychology SciencesVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Psychology of Development and Education
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defense mechanisms and their conceptualization in psychometric testing — Lena Barth, Barbara Ruettner, et al. · International Journal of Psychology Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS