Contemporary jurisprudential rulings on two issues of Islamic Law: Eating dead meat for obedient and disobedient travelers, and group participation in hunting in the sacred sanctuary of Mecca

This study aims to highlight and demonstrate the permissibility of eating carrion for those in need, whether traveling or residing in the country, provided the traveler is neither sinful nor repentant. This is provided that halal food is not available, that not eating it would pose a risk to one's life, and that the person eats only what is necessary and without extravagance. I also highlighted my humble research on the issue of a group participating in hunting in the Sacred Sanctuary of Mecca. I also demonstrated that if a group participates in killing game, they are subject to a single penalty, whether they directly kill it, or some of them are holding back, or each one of them is subject to a penalty. Therefore, I addressed this topic in my writing under the title (Contemporary Jurisprudential Rulings on Two Issues of Islamic Law: Eating Carrion by the Obedient and Disobedient Traveler, and Group Participation in Hunting in the Sacred Sanctuary of Mecca).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Humanities and Education Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33545/26649799.2025.v7.i1f.184
Primary Topic
Halal products and consumer behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contemporary jurisprudential rulings on two issues of Islamic Law: Eating dead meat for obedient and disobedient travelers, and group participation in hunting in the sacred sanctuary of Mecca

Farooq Abbas Nooraldeen
International Journal of Humanities and Education Research
Halal products and consumer behavior
article

Contemporary jurisprudential rulings on two issues of Islamic Law: Eating dead meat for obedient and disobedient travelers, and group participation in hunting in the sacred sanctuary of Mecca

Farooq Abbas Nooraldeen
article en

Abstract

This study aims to highlight and demonstrate the permissibility of eating carrion for those in need, whether traveling or residing in the country, provided the traveler is neither sinful nor repentant. This is provided that halal food is not available, that not eating it would pose a risk to one's life, and that the person eats only what is necessary and without extravagance. I also highlighted my humble research on the issue of a group participating in hunting in the Sacred Sanctuary of Mecca. I also demonstrated that if a group participates in killing game, they are subject to a single penalty, whether they directly kill it, or some of them are holding back, or each one of them is subject to a penalty. Therefore, I addressed this topic in my writing under the title (Contemporary Jurisprudential Rulings on Two Issues of Islamic Law: Eating Carrion by the Obedient and Disobedient Traveler, and Group Participation in Hunting in the Sacred Sanctuary of Mecca).

International Journal of Humanities and Education ResearchVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Halal products and consumer behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Contemporary jurisprudential rulings on two issues of Islamic Law: Eating dead meat for obedient and disobedient travelers, and group participation in hunting in the sacred sanctuary of Mecca — Farooq Abbas Nooraldeen · International Journal of Humanities and Education Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS