Impact of Area Under the Concentration–Time Curve–Based Vancomycin Dosing on Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Methicillin‐Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Bacteremia

Background: The optimal strategy for dosing and monitoring vancomycin continues to evolve. A vancomycin 24‐h steady‐state area under the concentration–time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) of ≥ 400 has been associated with positive clinical outcomes, while an AUC/MIC &gt; 600–700 has been associated with increased risk of nephrotoxicity. The 2009 vancomycin dosing guidelines recommended target trough concentrations between 10–20 mcg/mL depending on infection; however, recent pharmacokinetic data suggest that most patients can achieve target AUC/MIC with trough concentrations &lt; 15 mcg/mL. While existing literature has demonstrated reduced nephrotoxicity with AUC‐guided dosing (AGD), there are limited data evaluating efficacy and other clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study compared the clinical efficacy of vancomycin using trough‐guided dosing (TGD) versus AGD in patients with confirmed methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, quasiexperimental study of adult patients who received vancomycin for treatment of MRSA bacteremia. Patients with central nervous system infections, weighing &gt; 200 kg, with acute kidney injury, or receiving hemodialysis/continuous renal replacement therapy were excluded. The primary outcome was microbiological success defined as negative blood cultures within 7 days of vancomycin initiation. Secondary outcomes included achievement of therapeutic target concentrations and incidence of nephrotoxicity. Results: Microbiological success was achieved in 52/55 (95%) patients with TGD versus 50/51 (98%) patients with AGD ( p = 0.619). In the TGD group, 24/55 (44%) patients achieved therapeutic target concentrations within 48 h of initiation of vancomycin compared to 24/51 (47%) patients in the AGD group ( p = 0.723). The median hospital length of stay was longer in the TGD group compared to the AGD group (16 days, IQR 11–27 days versus 13 days, IQR 9–24 days, respectively, p = 0.260). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 7/55 (13%) TGD patients versus 5/51 (10%) AGD patients during vancomycin therapy ( p = 0.763). Conclusions: AGD was similar to TGD at achieving microbiological success in patients with MRSA bacteremia and may lead to shorter lengths of hospital stay and lower rates of nephrotoxicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jcpt/5147445
Primary Topic
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Area Under the Concentration–Time Curve–Based Vancomycin Dosing on Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Amy Chang, Kerri E. Degenkolb, Christie M. Davis, Christopher Geik et al.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
article

Impact of Area Under the Concentration–Time Curve–Based Vancomycin Dosing on Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Amy Chang, Kerri E. Degenkolb, Christie M. Davis, Christopher Geik, Sharon M. Erdman, Michael Kays, Megan Cheatham
article en

Abstract

Background: The optimal strategy for dosing and monitoring vancomycin continues to evolve. A vancomycin 24‐h steady‐state area under the concentration–time curve/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) of ≥ 400 has been associated with positive clinical outcomes, while an AUC/MIC &gt; 600–700 has been associated with increased risk of nephrotoxicity. The 2009 vancomycin dosing guidelines recommended target trough concentrations between 10–20 mcg/mL depending on infection; however, recent pharmacokinetic data suggest that most patients can achieve target AUC/MIC with trough concentrations &lt; 15 mcg/mL. While existing literature has demonstrated reduced nephrotoxicity with AUC‐guided dosing (AGD), there are limited data evaluating efficacy and other clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study compared the clinical efficacy of vancomycin using trough‐guided dosing (TGD) versus AGD in patients with confirmed methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, quasiexperimental study of adult patients who received vancomycin for treatment of MRSA bacteremia. Patients with central nervous system infections, weighing &gt; 200 kg, with acute kidney injury, or receiving hemodialysis/continuous renal replacement therapy were excluded. The primary outcome was microbiological success defined as negative blood cultures within 7 days of vancomycin initiation. Secondary outcomes included achievement of therapeutic target concentrations and incidence of nephrotoxicity. Results: Microbiological success was achieved in 52/55 (95%) patients with TGD versus 50/51 (98%) patients with AGD ( p = 0.619). In the TGD group, 24/55 (44%) patients achieved therapeutic target concentrations within 48 h of initiation of vancomycin compared to 24/51 (47%) patients in the AGD group ( p = 0.723). The median hospital length of stay was longer in the TGD group compared to the AGD group (16 days, IQR 11–27 days versus 13 days, IQR 9–24 days, respectively, p = 0.260). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 7/55 (13%) TGD patients versus 5/51 (10%) AGD patients during vancomycin therapy ( p = 0.763). Conclusions: AGD was similar to TGD at achieving microbiological success in patients with MRSA bacteremia and may lead to shorter lengths of hospital stay and lower rates of nephrotoxicity.

Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and TherapeuticsVol. 2025(1)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Eskenazi Health Foundation (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.