An incomplete recipe: One-dimensional latent variables do not capture the full flavor of democratic support

Prominent recent works have measured democratic support using a single latent variable that purports to span a single dimension from steadfast opposition to whole-hearted support. This ignores ample evidence that support for democracy is complex and multidimensional. Here we provide a series of validation tests of the sort of cross-national time-series latent variable measures employed in recent research by reference to questions on support for liberal democracy and opposition to its erosion from multi-wave surveys conducted around the world. These tests show that, across countries and years, this latent variable is nearly orthogonal to measures of support for contestation and participation; civil liberties; institutional constraints on executive power; and prioritizing democracy over the economy, economic equality, or order. We conclude that support for democracy in any robust sense is simply not well captured by one-dimensional latent variable. Such measures are powerful but researchers must be mindful of their limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research & Politics
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680251341857
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An incomplete recipe: One-dimensional latent variables do not capture the full flavor of democratic support

Frederick Solt, Byung‐Deuk Woo, Yue Hu, Hyein Ko et al.
2 citations
Research & Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
17.04
article

An incomplete recipe: One-dimensional latent variables do not capture the full flavor of democratic support

Frederick Solt, Byung‐Deuk Woo, Yue Hu, Hyein Ko, Yuehong Cassandra Tai
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Prominent recent works have measured democratic support using a single latent variable that purports to span a single dimension from steadfast opposition to whole-hearted support. This ignores ample evidence that support for democracy is complex and multidimensional. Here we provide a series of validation tests of the sort of cross-national time-series latent variable measures employed in recent research by reference to questions on support for liberal democracy and opposition to its erosion from multi-wave surveys conducted around the world. These tests show that, across countries and years, this latent variable is nearly orthogonal to measures of support for contestation and participation; civil liberties; institutional constraints on executive power; and prioritizing democracy over the economy, economic equality, or order. We conclude that support for democracy in any robust sense is simply not well captured by one-dimensional latent variable. Such measures are powerful but researchers must be mindful of their limitations.

Research & PoliticsVol. 12(2)
University of Iowa (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Incheon National University (KR), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Illinois System (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
17.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An incomplete recipe: One-dimensional latent variables do not capture the full flavor of democratic support — Frederick Solt, Byung‐Deuk Woo, et al. · Research & Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS