CT-scan, SEM, EDX, flowability, rheology, permeability and tensile test analysis of recycled Ti6Al4V powders for 3D printing

This study investigates the use of three different recycled powder sets for 3D printing biomedical components, addressing the growing need for sustainable manufacturing solutions. Despite the widespread use of virgin powder in additive manufacturing, there is limited research on the performance of reconditioned powders. This study fills that gap by analyzing the performance of virgin powder, reconditioned powder, a mixed powder containing 50% fresh and 50% 7-times recycled powder, and a 7-times recycled powder (C7-only). The powders were systematically sampled, sieved, and used to print test samples such as cubes and tensile bars. The chemical composition, powder size distribution, and flowability of the powders were examined and correlated with mechanical tensile tests and porosity levels in the printed parts. Results indicate that reconditioned powder exhibits superior flowability compared to the mixed or C7-only powders. Notably, the tensile strength and strain of parts made from C7-only and mixed powders surpassed those made from virgin powder, despite a slightly higher porosity in the recycled powder samples. This study highlights the potential advantages of using reconditioned powder in the additive manufacturing of biomedical components, offering a less costly and environmentally friendly alternative for producing sensitive medical parts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metallurgical Research & Technology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2025032
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CT-scan, SEM, EDX, flowability, rheology, permeability and tensile test analysis of recycled Ti6Al4V powders for 3D printing

Fuad A. A. Awwad, Emad A.A. Ismail, Nima E. Gorji, Ming‐Lang Tseng
5 citations
Metallurgical Research & Technology
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
3.41
article

CT-scan, SEM, EDX, flowability, rheology, permeability and tensile test analysis of recycled Ti6Al4V powders for 3D printing

Fuad A. A. Awwad, Emad A.A. Ismail, Nima E. Gorji, Ming‐Lang Tseng
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the use of three different recycled powder sets for 3D printing biomedical components, addressing the growing need for sustainable manufacturing solutions. Despite the widespread use of virgin powder in additive manufacturing, there is limited research on the performance of reconditioned powders. This study fills that gap by analyzing the performance of virgin powder, reconditioned powder, a mixed powder containing 50% fresh and 50% 7-times recycled powder, and a 7-times recycled powder (C7-only). The powders were systematically sampled, sieved, and used to print test samples such as cubes and tensile bars. The chemical composition, powder size distribution, and flowability of the powders were examined and correlated with mechanical tensile tests and porosity levels in the printed parts. Results indicate that reconditioned powder exhibits superior flowability compared to the mixed or C7-only powders. Notably, the tensile strength and strain of parts made from C7-only and mixed powders surpassed those made from virgin powder, despite a slightly higher porosity in the recycled powder samples. This study highlights the potential advantages of using reconditioned powder in the additive manufacturing of biomedical components, offering a less costly and environmentally friendly alternative for producing sensitive medical parts.

Metallurgical Research & TechnologyVol. 122(4)
Asia University (TW), China Medical University (TW), King Saud University (SA), China Medical University Hospital (TW), Waterford Institute of Technology (IE)
SFI Manufacturing
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
3.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.