Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowers Judicial Adjudication: Risk Resistance and Strategy

研究探讨了数字化时代下生成式人工智能在司法裁判中的前景与风险,并提出通过技术赋能,生成式人工智能可在证据展示、文书制作、裁判辅助等方面极大提升司法效率和透明度。当前,针对技术的深入应用存在内容可控性与真实性、裁判逻辑、以及司法伦理和监管保障等系列问题,研究提出“辅助为主、审查为要”的应用模式,强调人工智能技术与司法经验的协作,以确保法律裁判的可控性与公正性。The study explores the prospects and risks of generative artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication in the digital era, and proposes that through technological empowerment, generative artificial intelligence can greatly enhance judicial efficiency and transparency in the areas of evidence presentation, document production, and adjudication assistance. However, the in-depth application of the technology still has a series of problems such as content controllability and authenticity, adjudication logic, as well as judicial ethics and regulatory safeguards. In order to address these challenges, the study proposes an application model of “assistance as the mainstay, review as the mainstay”, which emphasizes the collaboration between artificial intelligence technology and judicial experience, in order to ensure the controllability and fairness of legal adjudication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2025.145423
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowers Judicial Adjudication: Risk Resistance and Strategy

静蕾 史
Advances in Social Sciences
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowers Judicial Adjudication: Risk Resistance and Strategy

静蕾 史
article en

Abstract

研究探讨了数字化时代下生成式人工智能在司法裁判中的前景与风险,并提出通过技术赋能,生成式人工智能可在证据展示、文书制作、裁判辅助等方面极大提升司法效率和透明度。当前,针对技术的深入应用存在内容可控性与真实性、裁判逻辑、以及司法伦理和监管保障等系列问题,研究提出“辅助为主、审查为要”的应用模式,强调人工智能技术与司法经验的协作,以确保法律裁判的可控性与公正性。The study explores the prospects and risks of generative artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication in the digital era, and proposes that through technological empowerment, generative artificial intelligence can greatly enhance judicial efficiency and transparency in the areas of evidence presentation, document production, and adjudication assistance. However, the in-depth application of the technology still has a series of problems such as content controllability and authenticity, adjudication logic, as well as judicial ethics and regulatory safeguards. In order to address these challenges, the study proposes an application model of “assistance as the mainstay, review as the mainstay”, which emphasizes the collaboration between artificial intelligence technology and judicial experience, in order to ensure the controllability and fairness of legal adjudication.

Advances in Social SciencesVol. 14(05)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.