Contested mining, state selectivities, and the reform of the mining law in Mexico

Research on extractivism has dealt with state policy struggles and the role of progressive governments in Latin America since the 2000s, with particular attention on the integration of formerly marginalized or opposing interests into government strategies and policies. Building on materialist state theory, we argue that a closer focus on selectivities of the state can better explain both the shifts towards an integration of formerly excluded demands and continuities in state selectivities favoring established accumulation strategies. We illustrate our argument through an analysis of the reform to Mexico's mining law. Backed by large sectors of society, representatives of the leftist government partly incorporated longstanding critique of large-scale mining into new or revised regulations. We view this reform as a magnifying glass that helps us examine changing power relations, showing how demands from actors that previously had little access to the state arena have been negotiated and how this shifted state selectivities in favor of anti-mining claims. By examining changes in Mexico's mining legislation, our study adds to the growing body of scholarship that analyzes the role of the state and left-wing governments in contested resource extraction from a historical-materialist perspective. Our contribution is both empirical and theoretical. Empirically, it examines the changing role of the state in extractivism within a country and geopolitical setting different from those studied in research on neo-extractivism in the 2000s. On the theoretical level, our analysis of a law and its reform uncovers power relations and struggles related to mining, as well as existing and shifting state selectivities. Our analysis thus informs theory-led empirical research on similar struggles overstate involvement and regulation in other Latin American countries, particularly in the context of changing geopolitics and increasing demand for minerals and metals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Geography
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103348
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mining and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contested mining, state selectivities, and the reform of the mining law in Mexico

Rosa Lehmann, Rafael Hernández Westpfahl
2 citations
Political Geography
Mining and Resource Management
2.01
article

Contested mining, state selectivities, and the reform of the mining law in Mexico

Rosa Lehmann, Rafael Hernández Westpfahl
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Research on extractivism has dealt with state policy struggles and the role of progressive governments in Latin America since the 2000s, with particular attention on the integration of formerly marginalized or opposing interests into government strategies and policies. Building on materialist state theory, we argue that a closer focus on selectivities of the state can better explain both the shifts towards an integration of formerly excluded demands and continuities in state selectivities favoring established accumulation strategies. We illustrate our argument through an analysis of the reform to Mexico's mining law. Backed by large sectors of society, representatives of the leftist government partly incorporated longstanding critique of large-scale mining into new or revised regulations. We view this reform as a magnifying glass that helps us examine changing power relations, showing how demands from actors that previously had little access to the state arena have been negotiated and how this shifted state selectivities in favor of anti-mining claims. By examining changes in Mexico's mining legislation, our study adds to the growing body of scholarship that analyzes the role of the state and left-wing governments in contested resource extraction from a historical-materialist perspective. Our contribution is both empirical and theoretical. Empirically, it examines the changing role of the state in extractivism within a country and geopolitical setting different from those studied in research on neo-extractivism in the 2000s. On the theoretical level, our analysis of a law and its reform uncovers power relations and struggles related to mining, as well as existing and shifting state selectivities. Our analysis thus informs theory-led empirical research on similar struggles overstate involvement and regulation in other Latin American countries, particularly in the context of changing geopolitics and increasing demand for minerals and metals.

Political GeographyVol. 120
Heidelberg University (DE), Heidelberg Engineering (Germany) (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mining and Resource Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.