Genetic Species Concept as Applied to Multilocus Nuclear Data

Using the example of multiple species groups and species complexes, it is empirically shown that the resolving power of a set of 10–20 nuclear loci is insufficient for the study of their genetic differentiation. For an adequate analysis of phylogenetic relationships (including reticulation events) and assessment of divergence levels within such groups of closely related species, it is necessary to multiply the number of nuclear loci and transit to high-throughput next-generation deep sequencing. However, the question of the genomic coverage required for the purposes of such study remains open. In other words, exactly how many genes in a set are needed to measure the genetic distance resolving the relationships between branches on the phylogenetic tree reconstruction of a complex of closely related species? We chose protein-coding sequences as a standard set of markers. Distances of 160–180 genes with a combined length of 270 000–300 000 bp were used to estimate the divergence levels of closely related mammalian species. In most cases, the interspecific distances are within the range of 0.15–0.75% (median of 0.33%). The range of distances between semi-species is 0.12–0.28% (median of 0.14%). Intraspecific distances are always lower than 0.11%. Rodents show higher values of interspecific distances, 0.25–2.3% (median of 0.72%); distances between half-species range from 0.1 to 0.35%. To determine the number of nuclear loci and their combined length sufficient for the calculation of a genetic distance, we use simulations based on a model that included the following parameters: the average rate of gene evolution, its dispersion, and the level of polymorphism in the modern and ancestral populations. We performed a preliminary analysis of the distribution of evolution rates of loci among mammalian taxa based on the data on ~50 000 nuclear markers. It is shown that a relative error of 10–15%, comparable to the same value for mitochondrial distances between close species based on individual genes (approximately 1000 bp in length), is achieved using approximately 100 loci of 300 bp in length. On the basis of these data, we propose the following working hypothesis: the threshold of interspecific/intraspecific genetic distance calculated on the basis of the exons most frequently used in mammalian molecular phylogenetics is approximately 0.15%. This hypothesis assumes a species rank for the forms in statu nascendi. It should be noted that not all “good” species have significant genetic distances, since in some cases reproductive barriers form faster than substitutions accumulate in the genome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology Bulletin Reviews
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s207908642570001x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic Species Concept as Applied to Multilocus Nuclear Data

А. А. Банникова, S. A. Kosushkin, Vladimir S. Lebedev
1 citations
Biology Bulletin Reviews
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
0.81
article

Genetic Species Concept as Applied to Multilocus Nuclear Data

А. А. Банникова, S. A. Kosushkin, Vladimir S. Lebedev
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Using the example of multiple species groups and species complexes, it is empirically shown that the resolving power of a set of 10–20 nuclear loci is insufficient for the study of their genetic differentiation. For an adequate analysis of phylogenetic relationships (including reticulation events) and assessment of divergence levels within such groups of closely related species, it is necessary to multiply the number of nuclear loci and transit to high-throughput next-generation deep sequencing. However, the question of the genomic coverage required for the purposes of such study remains open. In other words, exactly how many genes in a set are needed to measure the genetic distance resolving the relationships between branches on the phylogenetic tree reconstruction of a complex of closely related species? We chose protein-coding sequences as a standard set of markers. Distances of 160–180 genes with a combined length of 270 000–300 000 bp were used to estimate the divergence levels of closely related mammalian species. In most cases, the interspecific distances are within the range of 0.15–0.75% (median of 0.33%). The range of distances between semi-species is 0.12–0.28% (median of 0.14%). Intraspecific distances are always lower than 0.11%. Rodents show higher values of interspecific distances, 0.25–2.3% (median of 0.72%); distances between half-species range from 0.1 to 0.35%. To determine the number of nuclear loci and their combined length sufficient for the calculation of a genetic distance, we use simulations based on a model that included the following parameters: the average rate of gene evolution, its dispersion, and the level of polymorphism in the modern and ancestral populations. We performed a preliminary analysis of the distribution of evolution rates of loci among mammalian taxa based on the data on ~50 000 nuclear markers. It is shown that a relative error of 10–15%, comparable to the same value for mitochondrial distances between close species based on individual genes (approximately 1000 bp in length), is achieved using approximately 100 loci of 300 bp in length. On the basis of these data, we propose the following working hypothesis: the threshold of interspecific/intraspecific genetic distance calculated on the basis of the exons most frequently used in mammalian molecular phylogenetics is approximately 0.15%. This hypothesis assumes a species rank for the forms in statu nascendi. It should be noted that not all “good” species have significant genetic distances, since in some cases reproductive barriers form faster than substitutions accumulate in the genome.

Biology Bulletin ReviewsVol. 15(3)
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology (RU), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.