Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of KRAS and TP53 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma

Introduction: KRAS and TP53 mutations are among the most common genetic mutations in cholangiocarcinoma. Objective: This study aimed to explore the potential impact of these mutations on the survival prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma patients through a meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for cohort studies published up to April 2025 that investigated the relationship between KRAS and TP53 mutations and patient prognosis. Two researchers independently performed the literature screening and data extraction. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17.0, with assessment of publication bias. Results: Twelve studies were included, involving a total of 1,126 patients, with 167 cases of KRAS mutations and 176 cases of TP53 mutations. The results showed that both KRAS and TP53 mutations were significantly associated with poorer survival prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma patients. For KRAS (hazard ratio (HR)=7.26; 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.10 – 9.81; p<0.05) and TP53 (HR=18.13; 95% CI: 11.24 – 25.32; p<0.05), the presence of mutations predicted an adverse prognosis. Conclusion: While these findings suggest that KRAS and TP53 mutations are associated with worse survival in cholangiocarcinoma, the limited number and quality of the included studies warrant further high-quality research to validate these associations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology
Published
2025-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36922/ejmo025120063
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of KRAS and TP53 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma

Chuhan Zhang, Benfeng Xu, J. Jin, Yibin Zhou
1 citations
Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
2.01
article

Meta-analysis of the prognostic value of KRAS and TP53 mutations in cholangiocarcinoma

Chuhan Zhang, Benfeng Xu, J. Jin, Yibin Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: KRAS and TP53 mutations are among the most common genetic mutations in cholangiocarcinoma. Objective: This study aimed to explore the potential impact of these mutations on the survival prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma patients through a meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for cohort studies published up to April 2025 that investigated the relationship between KRAS and TP53 mutations and patient prognosis. Two researchers independently performed the literature screening and data extraction. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17.0, with assessment of publication bias. Results: Twelve studies were included, involving a total of 1,126 patients, with 167 cases of KRAS mutations and 176 cases of TP53 mutations. The results showed that both KRAS and TP53 mutations were significantly associated with poorer survival prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma patients. For KRAS (hazard ratio (HR)=7.26; 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.10 – 9.81; p<0.05) and TP53 (HR=18.13; 95% CI: 11.24 – 25.32; p<0.05), the presence of mutations predicted an adverse prognosis. Conclusion: While these findings suggest that KRAS and TP53 mutations are associated with worse survival in cholangiocarcinoma, the limited number and quality of the included studies warrant further high-quality research to validate these associations.

Eurasian Journal of Medicine and OncologyVol. 9(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.