Facilitating online professional learning networks: considerations and tensions that influence facilitation

Purpose Professional learning networks (PLNs) are increasingly used as vehicles for professional learning. This study analyses and describes the considerations and tensions that influenced the facilitation of synchronous online PLN meetings in a multi-state, cross-disciplinary literacy initiative in the USA. Design/methodology/approach Secondary data analysis of data sources collected as part of the initiative were: video recordings of 11 online PLN meetings of science, technology, engineering and mathematics and humanities teachers, as well as accompanying materials and resources for teachers and facilitators. These data were triangulated primarily with teacher attendance records and a teacher survey. Findings Drawing on a constant comparative approach, our analysis revealed three interrelated tensions that affect facilitator moves and PLN meeting content: allowing flexible participation versus having stable learning communities, focusing on depth versus breadth of knowledge-building when inquiry is the key focus of a PLN and using meeting protocols as procedural guides versus as tools to support inquiry. Originality/value This study addresses a gap in the literature in understanding the design considerations and tensions influencing online PLN facilitation and demonstrates how practical implications such as time and funding intersect with learning goals and PLN design to influence facilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-10-2024-0173
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitating online professional learning networks: considerations and tensions that influence facilitation

Irisa Charney‐Sirott, Henning Fjørtoft, Mei Kuin Lai, Mira‐Lisa Katz
2 citations
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Online and Blended Learning
17.85
article

Facilitating online professional learning networks: considerations and tensions that influence facilitation

Irisa Charney‐Sirott, Henning Fjørtoft, Mei Kuin Lai, Mira‐Lisa Katz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose Professional learning networks (PLNs) are increasingly used as vehicles for professional learning. This study analyses and describes the considerations and tensions that influenced the facilitation of synchronous online PLN meetings in a multi-state, cross-disciplinary literacy initiative in the USA. Design/methodology/approach Secondary data analysis of data sources collected as part of the initiative were: video recordings of 11 online PLN meetings of science, technology, engineering and mathematics and humanities teachers, as well as accompanying materials and resources for teachers and facilitators. These data were triangulated primarily with teacher attendance records and a teacher survey. Findings Drawing on a constant comparative approach, our analysis revealed three interrelated tensions that affect facilitator moves and PLN meeting content: allowing flexible participation versus having stable learning communities, focusing on depth versus breadth of knowledge-building when inquiry is the key focus of a PLN and using meeting protocols as procedural guides versus as tools to support inquiry. Originality/value This study addresses a gap in the literature in understanding the design considerations and tensions influencing online PLN facilitation and demonstrates how practical implications such as time and funding intersect with learning goals and PLN design to influence facilitation.

Journal of Professional Capital and CommunityVol. 11(1)
Wested (US), University of Auckland (NZ), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Online and Blended Learning
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.