Consequences of Oil Spills on the Subsurface Resistivity of Soil in Biseni Community of Yenagoa Local Government Area of Bayelsa State in Niger Delta, Nigeria

Two Electrical Geophysical methods were used at Biseni community in Bayelsa state to determine the effects of Oil spills on the subsurface resistivity in the area. Five Schlumberger Vertical Electrical Soundings (VES) with a maximum Current electrode spread of 300.00m were carried out outside the polluted area while 2D Wenner array of 100.00m coverage was used at the spill location. The interpretation was done using computer programmes, IP2win for VES data and RES2DINV software for 2D data. The resistivity curve types obtained are QKA (VES 1), QA (VES 2), HKA (VES 3) HA (VES 4), and AKA (VES 5), to reveal heterogeneity nature of the subsurface in the area. Six continuous layers were identified from the 2D true resistivity distribution inversion. The first two layers, from VES 1 to VES 5, at depth (0.3m – 3.4m) have resistivity values ranging between 4.46 Ωm and 468.1 Ωm. Correspondingly, at the polluted location, at depth (1.25m – 3.75m), the resistivities recorded are between 11 Ωm and 47.46 Ωm. The next two layers (three and four) situated at depth interval (1.7739 m – 69.85 m) have minimum and maximum resistivity values of 6.38 Ωm and 344 Ωm respectively. Res2inv imaging revealed resistivity between 2.52 Ωm and 11.6 Ωm situated at 3.75m to 8.44m depth. The last three layers (five, six and seven) outside the location have 3.29 Ωm to 31443 Ωm resistivity between 13m and 69m at the substratum. The 2D imaging have 0.133 Ωm to 2. 0 Ωm at depth interval 8.44m to 15.9 m. It shows lower resistivity values at the polluted site and this reduction (0.133 Ωm – 2.52 Ωm) continues downward into the substratum. However, outside the polluted site, the resistivity increases downward in VES 2, 3, VES 4 and VES 5, with recorded values of 31443, 8203, 2051 and 261 Ωm respectively, while high and low resistivity alternate in VES 1. The resistivity values encountered at the Oil spills side range between 0.031 – 900Ωm, and 45.32 to 9347 Ωm at the control location. The depth at about 16.00m, marked the limit of contamination, as indicated by observed reduced resistivity but increased in values beyond this point.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51584/ijrias.2025.10050007
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consequences of Oil Spills on the Subsurface Resistivity of Soil in Biseni Community of Yenagoa Local Government Area of Bayelsa State in Niger Delta, Nigeria

Abbass Adebayo Adetona, Isaac Oludayo Adedokun
1 links
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Consequences of Oil Spills on the Subsurface Resistivity of Soil in Biseni Community of Yenagoa Local Government Area of Bayelsa State in Niger Delta, Nigeria

Abbass Adebayo Adetona, Isaac Oludayo Adedokun
article en

Abstract

Two Electrical Geophysical methods were used at Biseni community in Bayelsa state to determine the effects of Oil spills on the subsurface resistivity in the area. Five Schlumberger Vertical Electrical Soundings (VES) with a maximum Current electrode spread of 300.00m were carried out outside the polluted area while 2D Wenner array of 100.00m coverage was used at the spill location. The interpretation was done using computer programmes, IP2win for VES data and RES2DINV software for 2D data. The resistivity curve types obtained are QKA (VES 1), QA (VES 2), HKA (VES 3) HA (VES 4), and AKA (VES 5), to reveal heterogeneity nature of the subsurface in the area. Six continuous layers were identified from the 2D true resistivity distribution inversion. The first two layers, from VES 1 to VES 5, at depth (0.3m – 3.4m) have resistivity values ranging between 4.46 Ωm and 468.1 Ωm. Correspondingly, at the polluted location, at depth (1.25m – 3.75m), the resistivities recorded are between 11 Ωm and 47.46 Ωm. The next two layers (three and four) situated at depth interval (1.7739 m – 69.85 m) have minimum and maximum resistivity values of 6.38 Ωm and 344 Ωm respectively. Res2inv imaging revealed resistivity between 2.52 Ωm and 11.6 Ωm situated at 3.75m to 8.44m depth. The last three layers (five, six and seven) outside the location have 3.29 Ωm to 31443 Ωm resistivity between 13m and 69m at the substratum. The 2D imaging have 0.133 Ωm to 2. 0 Ωm at depth interval 8.44m to 15.9 m. It shows lower resistivity values at the polluted site and this reduction (0.133 Ωm – 2.52 Ωm) continues downward into the substratum. However, outside the polluted site, the resistivity increases downward in VES 2, 3, VES 4 and VES 5, with recorded values of 31443, 8203, 2051 and 261 Ωm respectively, while high and low resistivity alternate in VES 1. The resistivity values encountered at the Oil spills side range between 0.031 – 900Ωm, and 45.32 to 9347 Ωm at the control location. The depth at about 16.00m, marked the limit of contamination, as indicated by observed reduced resistivity but increased in values beyond this point.

International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied ScienceVol. X(V)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.