Mungbean Response to Regulated Deficit Irrigation: A Trade‐Off Between Productivity and Adaptability?

ABSTRACT Water scarcity, elevated temperatures, as well as pests and diseases have been demonstrated to have a detrimental effect on the yield potential of mungbean ( Vigna radiata ). The cultivation of improved mungbean genotypes with regulated deficit irrigation (RDI), a water‐saving irrigation strategy, has been identified as a promising approach to enhance yield stability of the crop and ensure food security. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify adaptation strategies and possible trade‐offs to drought of mungbean genotypes under deficit irrigation and the effect on yield by investigating in particular assimilate re‐allocation. Four genotypes (NM11, AVMU 1604, AVMU 1635, KPS2) were cultivated in a greenhouse under three treatments of RDI with depletion fractions as a percentage of total available soil water (TAW) of 0.45, 0.65, and 0.8, corresponding to a recommended irrigation schedule, moderate and severe water deficit, respectively. Samples were collected at the flowering and maturity stages, and the dry matter, dry matter partitioning, yield, harvest index, pod harvest index, water use efficiency, and carbon‐13 isotope discrimination to estimate transpiration efficiency were determined. The study found that productivity (i.e., grain yield) was not lowered as a trade‐off of adaptability to water deficit irrigation. The genotypes either did not respond to deficit irrigation (KPS2 and AVMU 1635) in terms of grain yield or exhibited increased remobilisation of assimilates, either from pod walls to seeds (NM11) or from vegetative plant parts to pods/seeds (AVMU 1604), thereby increasing yields by 38% and 52%, respectively, under water deficit. However, the genotype KPS2 demonstrated stable yields and the greatest harvest index/pod harvest index (36%/69%) across all RDI treatments, suggesting superior adaptability to fluctuating water availability and efficient resource allocation, providing a suitable choice for a range of environmental conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.70070
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mungbean Response to Regulated Deficit Irrigation: A Trade‐Off Between Productivity and Adaptability?

Ramakrishnan M. Nair, Thomas Hilger, Lisa Pataczek, Georg Cadisch et al.
Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
article

Mungbean Response to Regulated Deficit Irrigation: A Trade‐Off Between Productivity and Adaptability?

Ramakrishnan M. Nair, Thomas Hilger, Lisa Pataczek, Georg Cadisch, Roland Schafleitner, Folkard Asch, Tim Hakenberg
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Water scarcity, elevated temperatures, as well as pests and diseases have been demonstrated to have a detrimental effect on the yield potential of mungbean ( Vigna radiata ). The cultivation of improved mungbean genotypes with regulated deficit irrigation (RDI), a water‐saving irrigation strategy, has been identified as a promising approach to enhance yield stability of the crop and ensure food security. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify adaptation strategies and possible trade‐offs to drought of mungbean genotypes under deficit irrigation and the effect on yield by investigating in particular assimilate re‐allocation. Four genotypes (NM11, AVMU 1604, AVMU 1635, KPS2) were cultivated in a greenhouse under three treatments of RDI with depletion fractions as a percentage of total available soil water (TAW) of 0.45, 0.65, and 0.8, corresponding to a recommended irrigation schedule, moderate and severe water deficit, respectively. Samples were collected at the flowering and maturity stages, and the dry matter, dry matter partitioning, yield, harvest index, pod harvest index, water use efficiency, and carbon‐13 isotope discrimination to estimate transpiration efficiency were determined. The study found that productivity (i.e., grain yield) was not lowered as a trade‐off of adaptability to water deficit irrigation. The genotypes either did not respond to deficit irrigation (KPS2 and AVMU 1635) in terms of grain yield or exhibited increased remobilisation of assimilates, either from pod walls to seeds (NM11) or from vegetative plant parts to pods/seeds (AVMU 1604), thereby increasing yields by 38% and 52%, respectively, under water deficit. However, the genotype KPS2 demonstrated stable yields and the greatest harvest index/pod harvest index (36%/69%) across all RDI treatments, suggesting superior adaptability to fluctuating water availability and efficient resource allocation, providing a suitable choice for a range of environmental conditions.

Journal of Agronomy and Crop ScienceVol. 211(4)
University of Hohenheim (DE), World Vegetable Center (TW)
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.