On the Convective Environments, Modes, and Warning Verifications of Tornado‐ and Flash Flood‐Warned Storms in the Southeast United States

ABSTRACT Thunderstorms can produce hazards to society such as tornadoes and flash floods, occasionally at the same time. These storms can be categorized by their convective mode, largely through their appearance on radar. Convective mode is an important factor in how forecasters analyze these threats and warn the public when necessary. This study uses a random forest classification technique to categorize two sets of storms in the Southeastern United States: one comprised of storms warned for tornadoes and flash floods at the same time, and the other warned for tornadoes without necessarily having a concurrent flash flood warning. The goal of these classifications was to use information about each storm's meteorological environment to identify (1) its mode and (2) whether the hazard warning(s) issued by the National Weather Service verified, or whether the warning was a “false alarm.” The models predicting mode generally exhibited more skill and identified differences between discrete modes and linear modes, particularly in upper‐level humidity, lapse rates, and low‐level wind speeds. The models predicting whether the warnings verified exhibited less skill, but indicated that environments favorable for tornadoes were characterized by stronger wind speeds, lower upper‐level moisture, and higher supercell composite parameter, while environments favorable for flash floods were characterized by greater moisture, lower wind speeds, and slower storm motion. These results are of note to researchers and forecasters seeking to better anticipate hazards, identify hazards, increase warning accuracy, and minimize false alarms as the implementation of artificial intelligence into the forecasting process continues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meteorological Applications
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/met.70062
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Convective Environments, Modes, and Warning Verifications of Tornado‐ and Flash Flood‐Warned Storms in the Southeast United States

Daniel Burow, Zoe Schroder, Kelsey Kressler
1 links
Meteorological Applications
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
article

On the Convective Environments, Modes, and Warning Verifications of Tornado‐ and Flash Flood‐Warned Storms in the Southeast United States

Daniel Burow, Zoe Schroder, Kelsey Kressler
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Thunderstorms can produce hazards to society such as tornadoes and flash floods, occasionally at the same time. These storms can be categorized by their convective mode, largely through their appearance on radar. Convective mode is an important factor in how forecasters analyze these threats and warn the public when necessary. This study uses a random forest classification technique to categorize two sets of storms in the Southeastern United States: one comprised of storms warned for tornadoes and flash floods at the same time, and the other warned for tornadoes without necessarily having a concurrent flash flood warning. The goal of these classifications was to use information about each storm's meteorological environment to identify (1) its mode and (2) whether the hazard warning(s) issued by the National Weather Service verified, or whether the warning was a “false alarm.” The models predicting mode generally exhibited more skill and identified differences between discrete modes and linear modes, particularly in upper‐level humidity, lapse rates, and low‐level wind speeds. The models predicting whether the warnings verified exhibited less skill, but indicated that environments favorable for tornadoes were characterized by stronger wind speeds, lower upper‐level moisture, and higher supercell composite parameter, while environments favorable for flash floods were characterized by greater moisture, lower wind speeds, and slower storm motion. These results are of note to researchers and forecasters seeking to better anticipate hazards, identify hazards, increase warning accuracy, and minimize false alarms as the implementation of artificial intelligence into the forecasting process continues.

Meteorological ApplicationsVol. 32(3)
Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
Foundation for Ichthyosis and Related Skin Types, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Convective Environments, Modes, and Warning Verifications of Tornado‐ and Flash Flood‐Warned Storms in the Southeast United States — Daniel Burow, Zoe Schroder, et al. · Meteorological Applications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS