Types of errors in Raven tests in a population with Down syndrome: An online assessment

The objective of this study was to describe the types of visuoperceptual errors on Raven tests in a sample of Mexican people with Down syndrome (DS), and to explore whether these errors were related to mental age (MA) or chronological age (CA). Participants included 50 people with DS, with a mean CA of 19.47 years and a mean MA of 7.40 years. The Raven Colored Progressive Matrices test was used to obtain the MA and also to analyze four types of errors: 1) difference, 2) figure repetition, 3) inadequate individuation, and 4) incomplete correlates. The study was carried out online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants made an average of 22.84 errors on a total of 36 items. No predominance was found of any of the four types of errors. However, MA was negatively correlated with three error types. Because there are similar proportions of the four errors, the results do not allow us to define a specific perceptual deficit profile; errors on the test could be the result of general difficulties in the organization of perceptual information. Future studies could investigate whether this pattern of results is related to cognitive abilities such as working memory or executive functions. • The objective of this study was to identify the types of errors made on Raven tests. Error types were defined as difference, figure repetition, inadequate individuation, and incomplete correlates. • This is the first study in a Mexican population with Down syndrome (DS) that analyzes the types of errors made on Raven tests to understand the types of perceptual information that present difficulties in processing. • The results from this and future studies could form the basis of educational intervention programs for people with DS, focused on enhancing the perceptual abilities represented by each of the four types of errors. Such interventions could help people with DS to achieve better cognitive performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Motivation
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102150
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Types of errors in Raven tests in a population with Down syndrome: An online assessment

Judith Salvador Cruz, Julia B. Barrón‐Martínez
Learning and Motivation
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Types of errors in Raven tests in a population with Down syndrome: An online assessment

Judith Salvador Cruz, Julia B. Barrón‐Martínez
article en

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the types of visuoperceptual errors on Raven tests in a sample of Mexican people with Down syndrome (DS), and to explore whether these errors were related to mental age (MA) or chronological age (CA). Participants included 50 people with DS, with a mean CA of 19.47 years and a mean MA of 7.40 years. The Raven Colored Progressive Matrices test was used to obtain the MA and also to analyze four types of errors: 1) difference, 2) figure repetition, 3) inadequate individuation, and 4) incomplete correlates. The study was carried out online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants made an average of 22.84 errors on a total of 36 items. No predominance was found of any of the four types of errors. However, MA was negatively correlated with three error types. Because there are similar proportions of the four errors, the results do not allow us to define a specific perceptual deficit profile; errors on the test could be the result of general difficulties in the organization of perceptual information. Future studies could investigate whether this pattern of results is related to cognitive abilities such as working memory or executive functions. • The objective of this study was to identify the types of errors made on Raven tests. Error types were defined as difference, figure repetition, inadequate individuation, and incomplete correlates. • This is the first study in a Mexican population with Down syndrome (DS) that analyzes the types of errors made on Raven tests to understand the types of perceptual information that present difficulties in processing. • The results from this and future studies could form the basis of educational intervention programs for people with DS, focused on enhancing the perceptual abilities represented by each of the four types of errors. Such interventions could help people with DS to achieve better cognitive performance.

Learning and MotivationVol. 91
Universidad de La Rioja (ES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.