Non-Invasive Myocardial Work Identifies Patients with Obstructive Coronary Lesions After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major complication following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Graft denervation results in silent ischemia, even when already established, requiring regular screening for early diagnosis. This study explores whether myocardial work (MW) can non-invasively identify OHT patients with obstructive coronary lesions (OCL). <b>Methods</b>: During regular follow-ups, 55 OHT recipients underwent paired, prospective coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examinations. Additionally, 57 healthy volunteers (HV) provided reference TTE data. Classic echocardiographic parameters, such as left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) and MW indices, were obtained in all individuals. Data from three groups were analyzed: HV, OHT patients without coronary lesions or with <50% lesions on the CCTA (OHT-non-OCL), and OHT patients with ≥50% lesions on the CCTA (OHT-OCL). <b>Results</b>: CCTA identified seven OHT patients with OCL. Significant differences across the groups existed for LV-GLS (OHT-OCL -10.6% CI -14 to -6.8 vs. OHT-non-OCL -15.6% CI -16.5 to -13.4% vs. HV -18% CI -20 to -16, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and global work efficiency (GWE) (OHT-OCL 87% CI 86 to 92 vs. OHT-non-OCL 94% CI 91 to 95 vs. HV 96% CI 95 to 97, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The optimal cut-off values identified using the Youden Index were LV-GLS < -14.4% (AUC 0.80, sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.71) and GWE < 89% (AUC 0.75, sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.85). Multivariate analysis showed GWE as the best marker for detecting OCL. <b>Conclusions</b>: GWE is the echocardiographic parameter that best identifies OHT patients that have OCL on CCTA. If validated in larger studies, GWE could become a readily accessible tool for CAV detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111352
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Invasive Myocardial Work Identifies Patients with Obstructive Coronary Lesions After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

Rebeca Manrique, Leticia Jimeno-San Martín, Nerea Martín‐Calvo, Gorka Bastarrika et al.
1 citations
Diagnostics
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
2.01
article

Non-Invasive Myocardial Work Identifies Patients with Obstructive Coronary Lesions After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

Rebeca Manrique, Leticia Jimeno-San Martín, Nerea Martín‐Calvo, Gorka Bastarrika, María Josefa Iribarren, Gregorio Rábago, Nahikari Salterain-González, Fernando Carazo, Ana Ezponda, Marina Pascual Izco, Inés Díaz‐Dorronsoro
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major complication following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT). Graft denervation results in silent ischemia, even when already established, requiring regular screening for early diagnosis. This study explores whether myocardial work (MW) can non-invasively identify OHT patients with obstructive coronary lesions (OCL). <b>Methods</b>: During regular follow-ups, 55 OHT recipients underwent paired, prospective coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examinations. Additionally, 57 healthy volunteers (HV) provided reference TTE data. Classic echocardiographic parameters, such as left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) and MW indices, were obtained in all individuals. Data from three groups were analyzed: HV, OHT patients without coronary lesions or with <50% lesions on the CCTA (OHT-non-OCL), and OHT patients with ≥50% lesions on the CCTA (OHT-OCL). <b>Results</b>: CCTA identified seven OHT patients with OCL. Significant differences across the groups existed for LV-GLS (OHT-OCL -10.6% CI -14 to -6.8 vs. OHT-non-OCL -15.6% CI -16.5 to -13.4% vs. HV -18% CI -20 to -16, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and global work efficiency (GWE) (OHT-OCL 87% CI 86 to 92 vs. OHT-non-OCL 94% CI 91 to 95 vs. HV 96% CI 95 to 97, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The optimal cut-off values identified using the Youden Index were LV-GLS < -14.4% (AUC 0.80, sensitivity 0.86, specificity 0.71) and GWE < 89% (AUC 0.75, sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.85). Multivariate analysis showed GWE as the best marker for detecting OCL. <b>Conclusions</b>: GWE is the echocardiographic parameter that best identifies OHT patients that have OCL on CCTA. If validated in larger studies, GWE could become a readily accessible tool for CAV detection.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(11)
Navarre Institute of Health Research (ES), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (ES), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.