Biochar enhances mitigation of CH4 and N2O emissions from rice fields under different irrigation and tillage managements

The present field study assessed the effects of different managements on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Mediterranean rice crop. Given the pressing need to identify sustainable agricultural practices that mitigate GHG emissions while maintaining productivity, the effects on GHG emisions of two irrigation methods (permanent flooding and sprinkler) and two tillage practices (conventional tillage and no-tillage), with or without biochar application (28 t ha −1 ) (short term and medium term effect) were analyzed. Over two years, emissions of methane (CH₄), carbon dioxide (CO₂), and nitrous oxide (N₂O) were measured, and global warming potential (GWP), yield-scaled GWP (GWP-y), and net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) were calculated under these different treatments: flooding with tillage (FST), sprinkler irrigation with tillage (SST), sprinkler irrigation without tillage (SSNT), and the corresponding biochar amendment treatments (FST-B, SST-B and SSNT-B). The results showed that flooding irrigation generated significant CH₄ emissions (with a mean value of 350 kg CH₄-C ha⁻¹ across biochar and non-biochar treatments), while sprinkler irrigation acted as a sink of CH 4 (mean value of −2.40 kg CH₄-C ha⁻¹). However, the transition from flooding to sprinkler irrigation, regardless of tillage systems, led to a significant increase in N 2 O emissions (whose values reached up to 10.7 N 2 O-N kg ha −1 ), which can be counteracted by biochar application (at both short or médium term), to values statistically similar to those of permanent flooding. Furthermore, throughout the study, the lowest values of GWP-y was observed under SST-B treatment. In addition, biochar contributed to a further rise in the NECB, regardless of irrigation and tillage methods. Therefore, the implementation of sprinkler irrigation, especially under tillage system, with biochar represents a effective strategy to greehouse gas mitigation, as well as to enhance the C inputs into NECB of rice crop. • Biochar under different irrigation and tillage practices changed the soils properties. • Biochar maintains the CH 4 sink condition under sprinkler irrigation. • Fresh and aged biochar reduced N₂O emissions under sprinkler irrigation. • Combined use of sprinkler and biochar reduced GWP-y values, especially under tillage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil and Tillage Research
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106660
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biochar enhances mitigation of CH4 and N2O emissions from rice fields under different irrigation and tillage managements

Damián Fernández-Rodríguez, David Fangueiro, Luis Andrés Vicente, José Rato Nunes et al.
6 citations
Soil and Tillage Research
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
7.12
article

Biochar enhances mitigation of CH4 and N2O emissions from rice fields under different irrigation and tillage managements

Damián Fernández-Rodríguez, David Fangueiro, Luis Andrés Vicente, José Rato Nunes, David Peña, Ángel Albarrán, Antonio López‐Piñeiro
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The present field study assessed the effects of different managements on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Mediterranean rice crop. Given the pressing need to identify sustainable agricultural practices that mitigate GHG emissions while maintaining productivity, the effects on GHG emisions of two irrigation methods (permanent flooding and sprinkler) and two tillage practices (conventional tillage and no-tillage), with or without biochar application (28 t ha −1 ) (short term and medium term effect) were analyzed. Over two years, emissions of methane (CH₄), carbon dioxide (CO₂), and nitrous oxide (N₂O) were measured, and global warming potential (GWP), yield-scaled GWP (GWP-y), and net ecosystem carbon balance (NECB) were calculated under these different treatments: flooding with tillage (FST), sprinkler irrigation with tillage (SST), sprinkler irrigation without tillage (SSNT), and the corresponding biochar amendment treatments (FST-B, SST-B and SSNT-B). The results showed that flooding irrigation generated significant CH₄ emissions (with a mean value of 350 kg CH₄-C ha⁻¹ across biochar and non-biochar treatments), while sprinkler irrigation acted as a sink of CH 4 (mean value of −2.40 kg CH₄-C ha⁻¹). However, the transition from flooding to sprinkler irrigation, regardless of tillage systems, led to a significant increase in N 2 O emissions (whose values reached up to 10.7 N 2 O-N kg ha −1 ), which can be counteracted by biochar application (at both short or médium term), to values statistically similar to those of permanent flooding. Furthermore, throughout the study, the lowest values of GWP-y was observed under SST-B treatment. In addition, biochar contributed to a further rise in the NECB, regardless of irrigation and tillage methods. Therefore, the implementation of sprinkler irrigation, especially under tillage system, with biochar represents a effective strategy to greehouse gas mitigation, as well as to enhance the C inputs into NECB of rice crop. • Biochar under different irrigation and tillage practices changed the soils properties. • Biochar maintains the CH 4 sink condition under sprinkler irrigation. • Fresh and aged biochar reduced N₂O emissions under sprinkler irrigation. • Combined use of sprinkler and biochar reduced GWP-y values, especially under tillage.

Soil and Tillage ResearchVol. 253
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Portalegre (PT), Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
7.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.