Can high-resolution monitoring provide a better understanding of the hyporheic zone in Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems?

The hyporheic zone is an essential component of river ecosystems, yet it is often overlooked in environmental studies. A comprehensive understanding of the interactions between surface water (SW) and groundwater (GW), as well as the role of Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems (GDEs) in providing essential ecosystem services, is crucial for informed and effective land and water management (Yang and 2017). GDEs are influenced by local hydrogeology and climate, necessitating detailed spatial and temporal monitoring of the physical and chemical interactions occurring within these systems. Traditional monitoring methods, which typically rely on individual sensors to collect point data, can overlook important variations across different sections of a stream. By integrating continuous high-resolution longitudinal stream temperature monitoring with Electrical Conductivity (EC) and discharge measurements, more comprehensive data can be collected. This approach provides both high spatial and temporal resolution, capturing small-scale interactions and patterns that are crucial for understanding the SW-GW interface. Such methods are particularly valuable for localising SW-GW interactions and assessing their seasonal impact on GDEs' baseflow. To investigate these interactions, we employed a multidisciplinary approach combined with continuous high-resolution longitudinal stream temperature monitoring in the headwater stream of the Wüstebach Catchment, located within the TERENO Observatory in Eifel National Park, Germany. In October 2022, a Fibre Optic Distributed Temperature Sensing (FO-DTS) system (Silixa XT) was installed along a 500-meter-long stream section to monitor temperature changes over a hydrological year. Stream temperature measurements were recorded every 15 minutes at a resolution of 25 cm. Sampling was conducted at 18 sites distributed along the stream, tributaries, and existing groundwater wells, in conjunction with weekly sampling coordinated by site managers. Additionally, two intensive field campaigns were carried out during the wet and dry seasons, incorporating high-frequency EC measurements and tracer tests to capture specific hydrological events such as snowmelt and intense rainfall. These efforts aimed to deepen the understanding of groundwater recharge and discharge processes. Additional discharge and precipitation data were obtained from the TERENO Eifel database. Despite the limited groundwater network at the study site, this approach significantly enhanced our understanding of SW-GW interactions and their role in driving the seasonal flow variations of GDEs. It also led to the quantification of SW-GW interactions and the development of standardised methods that can be applied and scaled to larger areas, complementing and strengthening existing monitoring efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ARPHA Conference Abstracts
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.8.e155243
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can high-resolution monitoring provide a better understanding of the hyporheic zone in Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems?

Κ. Κατσάνου, Roland Bol, Raymond Venneker, Alessandro Cattapan et al.
ARPHA Conference Abstracts
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
article

Can high-resolution monitoring provide a better understanding of the hyporheic zone in Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems?

Κ. Κατσάνου, Roland Bol, Raymond Venneker, Alessandro Cattapan, Jochen Wenninger
article en

Abstract

The hyporheic zone is an essential component of river ecosystems, yet it is often overlooked in environmental studies. A comprehensive understanding of the interactions between surface water (SW) and groundwater (GW), as well as the role of Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems (GDEs) in providing essential ecosystem services, is crucial for informed and effective land and water management (Yang and 2017). GDEs are influenced by local hydrogeology and climate, necessitating detailed spatial and temporal monitoring of the physical and chemical interactions occurring within these systems. Traditional monitoring methods, which typically rely on individual sensors to collect point data, can overlook important variations across different sections of a stream. By integrating continuous high-resolution longitudinal stream temperature monitoring with Electrical Conductivity (EC) and discharge measurements, more comprehensive data can be collected. This approach provides both high spatial and temporal resolution, capturing small-scale interactions and patterns that are crucial for understanding the SW-GW interface. Such methods are particularly valuable for localising SW-GW interactions and assessing their seasonal impact on GDEs' baseflow. To investigate these interactions, we employed a multidisciplinary approach combined with continuous high-resolution longitudinal stream temperature monitoring in the headwater stream of the Wüstebach Catchment, located within the TERENO Observatory in Eifel National Park, Germany. In October 2022, a Fibre Optic Distributed Temperature Sensing (FO-DTS) system (Silixa XT) was installed along a 500-meter-long stream section to monitor temperature changes over a hydrological year. Stream temperature measurements were recorded every 15 minutes at a resolution of 25 cm. Sampling was conducted at 18 sites distributed along the stream, tributaries, and existing groundwater wells, in conjunction with weekly sampling coordinated by site managers. Additionally, two intensive field campaigns were carried out during the wet and dry seasons, incorporating high-frequency EC measurements and tracer tests to capture specific hydrological events such as snowmelt and intense rainfall. These efforts aimed to deepen the understanding of groundwater recharge and discharge processes. Additional discharge and precipitation data were obtained from the TERENO Eifel database. Despite the limited groundwater network at the study site, this approach significantly enhanced our understanding of SW-GW interactions and their role in driving the seasonal flow variations of GDEs. It also led to the quantification of SW-GW interactions and the development of standardised methods that can be applied and scaled to larger areas, complementing and strengthening existing monitoring efforts.

ARPHA Conference AbstractsVol. 8
Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), IHE Delft Institute for Water Education (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.