Understanding the reading practices of first-year university students through their experiences

Many studies have been conducted on the important role played by English reading literacy in the South African context and in many higher education institutions around the world. These studies come to the consensus that reading is considered the most important academic skill in any academic context, especially in institutions of higher education. However, because of a range of factors, many students lack the required level of reading proficiency. One important dimension of reading development often overlooked in research is the reading practices that students engage in. The current study, therefore, examines university students’ reading practices in the language of instruction, as well as the factors underlying these practices. The study was qualitative in nature and a case study design was followed. A questionnaire with open-ended questions was used to collect data from 65 respondents purposively selected. Content analysis was used to analyse students’ responses regarding their reading practices in English. The results showed that students did not read widely or extensively. They only read the books that were required of them to do better on assignments and tests. Additionally, the students’ reading preferences were influenced by the accessibility of social media and websites on the Internet. Students reported reading more posts on social media and websites than printed books. Contribution: This study found that a module’s recommended reading list significantly influenced students’ reading frequency and the time they spent on reading. In other words, the prescribed materials for the module affected both the selection of sources and the amount of time students devoted to reading them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Literator
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4102/lit.v46i1.2105
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the reading practices of first-year university students through their experiences

Tilla Olifant, Madoda Cekiso, Naomi Boakye
Literator
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Understanding the reading practices of first-year university students through their experiences

Tilla Olifant, Madoda Cekiso, Naomi Boakye
article en

Abstract

Many studies have been conducted on the important role played by English reading literacy in the South African context and in many higher education institutions around the world. These studies come to the consensus that reading is considered the most important academic skill in any academic context, especially in institutions of higher education. However, because of a range of factors, many students lack the required level of reading proficiency. One important dimension of reading development often overlooked in research is the reading practices that students engage in. The current study, therefore, examines university students’ reading practices in the language of instruction, as well as the factors underlying these practices. The study was qualitative in nature and a case study design was followed. A questionnaire with open-ended questions was used to collect data from 65 respondents purposively selected. Content analysis was used to analyse students’ responses regarding their reading practices in English. The results showed that students did not read widely or extensively. They only read the books that were required of them to do better on assignments and tests. Additionally, the students’ reading preferences were influenced by the accessibility of social media and websites on the Internet. Students reported reading more posts on social media and websites than printed books. Contribution: This study found that a module’s recommended reading list significantly influenced students’ reading frequency and the time they spent on reading. In other words, the prescribed materials for the module affected both the selection of sources and the amount of time students devoted to reading them.

Literator
Tshwane University of Technology (ZA), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding the reading practices of first-year university students through their experiences — Tilla Olifant, Madoda Cekiso, et al. · Literator (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS