Development of a Questionnaire for Assessing the Facilitators and Barriers Perceived by Stroke Patients Receiving Physiotherapy Treatment

Background: Physiotherapy benefits stroke patients by reducing pain, preventing complications, and enhancing quality of life. Adherence is crucial for successful treatment, yet many struggles. Addressing nonadherence causes is vital. Adherent patients have better outcomes, but poor adherence is common in physiotherapy. This study aims to develop and validate a questionnaire to analyse the challenges and facilitators that should be considered when giving physiotherapy treatment.Objective: To develop and validate the questionnaire for identifying facilitators and barriers among the stroke patients receiving physiotherapy treatment, between the relatives, medical management and stroke rehabilitation team and those that promote and inhibit stroke patients from receiving physiotherapy treatment.Methods: The questionnaire was developed in three phases: literature search, content validation and psychometric testing. The questionnaire items were derived from a thorough literature review suggesting all the facilitators and barriers perceived by stroke patients receiving physiotherapy. Face to face validation was done for the items of the questionnaire. The final version of the questionnaire contained two main and twelve sub domains. A total of 41 patients receiving physiotherapy or any other treatment were recruited from the tertiary care hospital and outpatient rehabilitation centre in Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar. Psychometric testing of the scale included content validation and reliability and validity testing.Results: The questionnaire, on reliability and validity test signifies good consistency- (Cronbach’s Alpha= 0.74. The KMO measure of sampling adequacy is 0.712 and Barlett’s test of Sphericity with approximate chi-square value is 96.085. These results are statistically significant at 5% level (p-value < 0.001). Hence all the statements are distributed normally. With reference to “initial Eigen values it is realized that 2 factors meet the cut-off criterion- Component 1 accounts for 38.586% the highest variability among components. The 2 components indicate cumulative % of 59.838% which is satisfactory for the overall variance explained which is assumed to be a standard.Conclusions: This study revealed key factors of adherence and nonadherence to the exercises among the stroke survivors receiving Physiotherapy treatment. The questionnaire has the possible potential to identify the contextual factors affecting the patients with stroke to access to the physiotherapy treatment.Keyword: Stroke, facilitators, barriers, questionnaire, physiotherapy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cuestiones de Fisioterapia
Published
2024-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48047/dsz5sw46
Primary Topic
Pharmacology and Nanomedicine Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a Questionnaire for Assessing the Facilitators and Barriers Perceived by Stroke Patients Receiving Physiotherapy Treatment

Gaurang Shah
Cuestiones de Fisioterapia
Pharmacology and Nanomedicine Research
article

Development of a Questionnaire for Assessing the Facilitators and Barriers Perceived by Stroke Patients Receiving Physiotherapy Treatment

Gaurang Shah
article en

Abstract

Background: Physiotherapy benefits stroke patients by reducing pain, preventing complications, and enhancing quality of life. Adherence is crucial for successful treatment, yet many struggles. Addressing nonadherence causes is vital. Adherent patients have better outcomes, but poor adherence is common in physiotherapy. This study aims to develop and validate a questionnaire to analyse the challenges and facilitators that should be considered when giving physiotherapy treatment.Objective: To develop and validate the questionnaire for identifying facilitators and barriers among the stroke patients receiving physiotherapy treatment, between the relatives, medical management and stroke rehabilitation team and those that promote and inhibit stroke patients from receiving physiotherapy treatment.Methods: The questionnaire was developed in three phases: literature search, content validation and psychometric testing. The questionnaire items were derived from a thorough literature review suggesting all the facilitators and barriers perceived by stroke patients receiving physiotherapy. Face to face validation was done for the items of the questionnaire. The final version of the questionnaire contained two main and twelve sub domains. A total of 41 patients receiving physiotherapy or any other treatment were recruited from the tertiary care hospital and outpatient rehabilitation centre in Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar. Psychometric testing of the scale included content validation and reliability and validity testing.Results: The questionnaire, on reliability and validity test signifies good consistency- (Cronbach’s Alpha= 0.74. The KMO measure of sampling adequacy is 0.712 and Barlett’s test of Sphericity with approximate chi-square value is 96.085. These results are statistically significant at 5% level (p-value < 0.001). Hence all the statements are distributed normally. With reference to “initial Eigen values it is realized that 2 factors meet the cut-off criterion- Component 1 accounts for 38.586% the highest variability among components. The 2 components indicate cumulative % of 59.838% which is satisfactory for the overall variance explained which is assumed to be a standard.Conclusions: This study revealed key factors of adherence and nonadherence to the exercises among the stroke survivors receiving Physiotherapy treatment. The questionnaire has the possible potential to identify the contextual factors affecting the patients with stroke to access to the physiotherapy treatment.Keyword: Stroke, facilitators, barriers, questionnaire, physiotherapy.

Cuestiones de FisioterapiaVol. 53(03)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Pharmacology and Nanomedicine Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.