Questioning the Use of the Veto

Abstract The unprecedented political cohesion that emerged within the General Assembly following the Russian aggression against Ukraine notoriously prompted the organ to exercise its residual responsibility for maintaining international peace and security. Yet, it also stimulated renewed attention to the Assembly’s institutional role vis-à-vis that of the Security Council. On April 26, 2022, the Assembly adopted resolution 76/262 on the so-called Veto Initiative, establishing a standing mandate for the organ to meet every time a veto is cast in the Security Council. The article argues that the Initiative constitutes a clear manifestation of the Assembly’s desire to reclaim an accountability function – a function which, though long neglected, the UN Charter already vests the organ with. By so doing, the Veto Initiative triggers the rediscovery and redefinition of the Assembly’s role in the UN institutional architecture, potentially opening a new season in the relationship between its main political organs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Community Law Review
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-bja10144
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Questioning the Use of the Veto

Laura Di Gianfrancesco
International Community Law Review
International Law and Human Rights
article

Questioning the Use of the Veto

Laura Di Gianfrancesco
article en

Abstract

Abstract The unprecedented political cohesion that emerged within the General Assembly following the Russian aggression against Ukraine notoriously prompted the organ to exercise its residual responsibility for maintaining international peace and security. Yet, it also stimulated renewed attention to the Assembly’s institutional role vis-à-vis that of the Security Council. On April 26, 2022, the Assembly adopted resolution 76/262 on the so-called Veto Initiative, establishing a standing mandate for the organ to meet every time a veto is cast in the Security Council. The article argues that the Initiative constitutes a clear manifestation of the Assembly’s desire to reclaim an accountability function – a function which, though long neglected, the UN Charter already vests the organ with. By so doing, the Veto Initiative triggers the rediscovery and redefinition of the Assembly’s role in the UN institutional architecture, potentially opening a new season in the relationship between its main political organs.

International Community Law ReviewVol. 27(3)
Roma Tre University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.