Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: An Observational Study

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> When pacemakers were first introduced, their indications and implantation techniques were quite limited. Over 400,000 permanent pacemakers are implanted annually worldwide, mostly under local anesthesia (LA), which is preferred for its hemodynamic stability. However, inadequate LA often leads to excessive use of local anesthetics or analgesics. This study evaluates the efficacy of combining interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) and superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) as regional anesthesia (RA) techniques during permanent pacemaker implantation compared to LA. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A total of 42 patients were divided into RA and LA groups. The RA group underwent ISB and SCPB under ultrasound guidance, while the LA group received traditional local anesthetic methods. <i>Results:</i> The RA group exhibited superior pain control, reduced analgesic requirements, and higher satisfaction rates compared to the LA group. Ultrasound guidance enhanced block success rates and minimized complications. <i>Conclusions:</i> ISB and SCPB offer a superior alternative to LA for pacemaker implantation, especially in patients with anxiety or insufficient LA response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61061001
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: An Observational Study

Yusuf İpek, Enes Çelik, Adem Aktan, Mehmet Zülküf Karahan et al.
1 citations
Medicina
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
article

Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation: An Observational Study

Yusuf İpek, Enes Çelik, Adem Aktan, Mehmet Zülküf Karahan, Hakan Akelma, Mehmet Ali Turgut, Muhammed Raşit Tanırcan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> When pacemakers were first introduced, their indications and implantation techniques were quite limited. Over 400,000 permanent pacemakers are implanted annually worldwide, mostly under local anesthesia (LA), which is preferred for its hemodynamic stability. However, inadequate LA often leads to excessive use of local anesthetics or analgesics. This study evaluates the efficacy of combining interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) and superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) as regional anesthesia (RA) techniques during permanent pacemaker implantation compared to LA. <i>Materials and Methods:</i> A total of 42 patients were divided into RA and LA groups. The RA group underwent ISB and SCPB under ultrasound guidance, while the LA group received traditional local anesthetic methods. <i>Results:</i> The RA group exhibited superior pain control, reduced analgesic requirements, and higher satisfaction rates compared to the LA group. Ultrasound guidance enhanced block success rates and minimized complications. <i>Conclusions:</i> ISB and SCPB offer a superior alternative to LA for pacemaker implantation, especially in patients with anxiety or insufficient LA response.

MedicinaVol. 61(6)
Mardin Artuklu University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.