Lex Specialis as a Reason-Giving Norm

Abstract Lex specialis is a fundamental tenet of law. It is particularly important in resolving conflicts between international humanitarian law ( IHL ) and human rights law ( HRL ). Nonetheless, in recent years, there has been growing interest in developing an alternative approach that harmonises IHL and HRL . This approach emphasises the mutual reinforcement of these two branches of law, rather than their opposition. However, the interaction between the harmonising approach and lex specialis remains poorly understood. This article proposes a reasoning framework for understanding lex specialis, including how it can be defeated. It explains that lex specialis can be seen as a second-order norm that prioritises certain norms over others by providing reasons that work in favour of the first group and against the second group. Nevertheless, the reasons given by lex specialis can be defeated by other reasons, thus reversing the primacy of specific norms over general ones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Community Law Review
Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-bja10138
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lex Specialis as a Reason-Giving Norm

Henrique Marcos
1 citations
International Community Law Review
European and International Law Studies
8.52
article

Lex Specialis as a Reason-Giving Norm

Henrique Marcos
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Lex specialis is a fundamental tenet of law. It is particularly important in resolving conflicts between international humanitarian law ( IHL ) and human rights law ( HRL ). Nonetheless, in recent years, there has been growing interest in developing an alternative approach that harmonises IHL and HRL . This approach emphasises the mutual reinforcement of these two branches of law, rather than their opposition. However, the interaction between the harmonising approach and lex specialis remains poorly understood. This article proposes a reasoning framework for understanding lex specialis, including how it can be defeated. It explains that lex specialis can be seen as a second-order norm that prioritises certain norms over others by providing reasons that work in favour of the first group and against the second group. Nevertheless, the reasons given by lex specialis can be defeated by other reasons, thus reversing the primacy of specific norms over general ones.

International Community Law ReviewVol. 27(3)
Maastricht University (NL)
Universiteit Maastricht
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
European and International Law Studies
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lex Specialis as a Reason-Giving Norm — Henrique Marcos · International Community Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS