Еvaluation of environmental research infrastructures services to address impacts on forest health and biodiversity

The potential of environmental research infrastructures (RIs) to fully implement the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles remains underutilised in addressing diverse challenges on global forest health and biodiversity. This study aims to characterise environmental RIs and their data services in tackling the effects of extreme climatic conditions on global forests. It examines the primary drivers of forest challenges across tropical, temperate, and boreal forest types, identifies the critical data required to understand these challenges, and explores the role and potential of environmental RIs in providing such data. A systematic literature search and review spanning 2013–2023 was conducted using sources such as Google, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify documented key drivers of forest impacts, along with the relevant data types and sources utilised in the selected articles. The result has been organised in these four categories of drivers: biophysical , biological , human-induced , and socioeconomic . Furthermore, the numerous forest impacts identified are grouped into ecological, physiological, socioeconomic, and climate-related impacts. Different data types were considered in this study, ranging from carbon flux data to other various forms of experimental and field observation data. Data sources ranged from local and national forest inventories to specialized monitoring networks and research infrastructures. Four terrestrial biosphere RIs— ICOS , AnaEE , LifeWatch , and eLTER —were assessed through their websites, annual reports, and impact assessments to evaluate their data services and potential contributions to climate change on global forests. The analysis explored the frequency and significance of integrating cross-RI multidisciplinary services. The study ultimately highlights existing gaps in RI data availability, accessibility, integration, and interoperability to address interconnected and overlapping global forest challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ARPHA Conference Abstracts
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.8.e149321
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Еvaluation of environmental research infrastructures services to address impacts on forest health and biodiversity

Dario Papale, Francesco Carbone, Omobola Eko
ARPHA Conference Abstracts
Forest Management and Policy
article

Еvaluation of environmental research infrastructures services to address impacts on forest health and biodiversity

Dario Papale, Francesco Carbone, Omobola Eko
article en

Abstract

The potential of environmental research infrastructures (RIs) to fully implement the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles remains underutilised in addressing diverse challenges on global forest health and biodiversity. This study aims to characterise environmental RIs and their data services in tackling the effects of extreme climatic conditions on global forests. It examines the primary drivers of forest challenges across tropical, temperate, and boreal forest types, identifies the critical data required to understand these challenges, and explores the role and potential of environmental RIs in providing such data. A systematic literature search and review spanning 2013–2023 was conducted using sources such as Google, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify documented key drivers of forest impacts, along with the relevant data types and sources utilised in the selected articles. The result has been organised in these four categories of drivers: biophysical , biological , human-induced , and socioeconomic . Furthermore, the numerous forest impacts identified are grouped into ecological, physiological, socioeconomic, and climate-related impacts. Different data types were considered in this study, ranging from carbon flux data to other various forms of experimental and field observation data. Data sources ranged from local and national forest inventories to specialized monitoring networks and research infrastructures. Four terrestrial biosphere RIs— ICOS , AnaEE , LifeWatch , and eLTER —were assessed through their websites, annual reports, and impact assessments to evaluate their data services and potential contributions to climate change on global forests. The analysis explored the frequency and significance of integrating cross-RI multidisciplinary services. The study ultimately highlights existing gaps in RI data availability, accessibility, integration, and interoperability to address interconnected and overlapping global forest challenges.

ARPHA Conference AbstractsVol. 8
Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT), National Research Council (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Forest Management and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.