Mitigating Cell Cycle Effects in Multi‐Omics Data: Solutions and Analytical Frameworks

Cell cycle structures vary significantly across cell types, which exhibit distinct phase compositions. Asynchronous DNA replication and dynamic cellular characteristics during the cell cycle result in considerable heterogeneity in DNA dosage, chromatin accessibility, methylation, and expression. Nonetheless, the consequences of cell cycle disruption in the interpretation of multi-omics data remain unclear. Here, we systematically assessed the influence of distinct cell phase structures on the interpretation of omics features in proliferating cells, and proposed solutions for each omics dataset. For copy number variation (CNV) calling, asynchronous replication timing (RT) interference induces false CNVs in cells with high S-phase ratio (SPR), which are significantly decreased following replication timing domain (RTD) correction. Similar noise is observed in the chromatin accessibility data. Moreover, for DNA methylation and transcriptomic analyses, cell cycle-sorted data outperformed direct comparison in elucidating the biological features of compared cells. Additionally, we established an integrated pipeline to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) after cell cycle phasing. Consequently, our study demonstrated extensive cell-cycle heterogeneity, warranting consideration in future studies involving cells with diverse cell-cycle structures. RTD correction or phase-specific comparison could reduce the influence of cell cycle composition on the analysis of the differences observed between stem and differentiated cells.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Science
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202505823
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigating Cell Cycle Effects in Multi‐Omics Data: Solutions and Analytical Frameworks

Yue Teng, Rui Lin Nie, Likun Ren, Jun Cai et al.
Advanced Science
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
article

Mitigating Cell Cycle Effects in Multi‐Omics Data: Solutions and Analytical Frameworks

Yue Teng, Rui Lin Nie, Likun Ren, Jun Cai, Yaoyu Sun, Lifei Wang, Caihong Zheng, Junya Li
article en

Abstract

Cell cycle structures vary significantly across cell types, which exhibit distinct phase compositions. Asynchronous DNA replication and dynamic cellular characteristics during the cell cycle result in considerable heterogeneity in DNA dosage, chromatin accessibility, methylation, and expression. Nonetheless, the consequences of cell cycle disruption in the interpretation of multi-omics data remain unclear. Here, we systematically assessed the influence of distinct cell phase structures on the interpretation of omics features in proliferating cells, and proposed solutions for each omics dataset. For copy number variation (CNV) calling, asynchronous replication timing (RT) interference induces false CNVs in cells with high S-phase ratio (SPR), which are significantly decreased following replication timing domain (RTD) correction. Similar noise is observed in the chromatin accessibility data. Moreover, for DNA methylation and transcriptomic analyses, cell cycle-sorted data outperformed direct comparison in elucidating the biological features of compared cells. Additionally, we established an integrated pipeline to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) after cell cycle phasing. Consequently, our study demonstrated extensive cell-cycle heterogeneity, warranting consideration in future studies involving cells with diverse cell-cycle structures. RTD correction or phase-specific comparison could reduce the influence of cell cycle composition on the analysis of the differences observed between stem and differentiated cells.

Advanced ScienceVol. 12(29)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), National Center for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Shanghai Center For Bioinformation Technology (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Hong Kong (HK)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.