Groundwater – surface water interactions revisited

Interactions between groundwater (GW) and surface water (SW) have been a focus of hydrologic research for some time. Seminal early work by Toth (1963) and later Winter (1999) had shown the existence of nested GW flow systems and stressed that surface water bodies are integral parts of these flow systems. Despite this early, integral perspective, a simpler perception of GW and SW as two distinct compartments, which interact via some often loosely defined transfer mechanisms, still prevails. This perception can be found in many hydrologic models, but can be misleading, as it implies the existence to two clearly separable compartments, while in fact GW and SW are part of a hydrologic continuum (as a part of the terrestrial hydrologic cycle), in which water dynamically transitions back and forth between surface water bodies (rivers, lakes, wetlands) and shallow aquifers. For example, shallow riparian groundwater may become stream water in one moment and return back to the alluvial aquifer in the next with implications for water and solute exchange and biogeochemical turnover. While simplified conceptualizations of the GW-SW hydrologic continuum may be acceptable for the simulation of catchment streamflow response, they usually fall short, when trying to represent fluxes and dynamics of nutrients and other solutes, which are typically controlled by hydrological and biogeochemical processes in the transition zone between GW and SW. I argue that in our quest to understand coupled hydrological and biogeochemical processes and GW dependent ecosystems at the catchment and landscape scales, we needed to revisit the perception of GW and SW as a hydrologic continuum. I will use the example of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export from a headwater catchment to stress this point and illustrate how rich field data and an integral numerical model can help to refine and improve a simplified conceptual model for catchment-scale DOC export. Finally an outlook will be given on future requirements for adequate monitoring and modeling of coupled GW-SW ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ARPHA Conference Abstracts
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.8.e148484
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Groundwater – surface water interactions revisited

Jan H. Fleckenstein
ARPHA Conference Abstracts
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
article

Groundwater – surface water interactions revisited

Jan H. Fleckenstein
article en

Abstract

Interactions between groundwater (GW) and surface water (SW) have been a focus of hydrologic research for some time. Seminal early work by Toth (1963) and later Winter (1999) had shown the existence of nested GW flow systems and stressed that surface water bodies are integral parts of these flow systems. Despite this early, integral perspective, a simpler perception of GW and SW as two distinct compartments, which interact via some often loosely defined transfer mechanisms, still prevails. This perception can be found in many hydrologic models, but can be misleading, as it implies the existence to two clearly separable compartments, while in fact GW and SW are part of a hydrologic continuum (as a part of the terrestrial hydrologic cycle), in which water dynamically transitions back and forth between surface water bodies (rivers, lakes, wetlands) and shallow aquifers. For example, shallow riparian groundwater may become stream water in one moment and return back to the alluvial aquifer in the next with implications for water and solute exchange and biogeochemical turnover. While simplified conceptualizations of the GW-SW hydrologic continuum may be acceptable for the simulation of catchment streamflow response, they usually fall short, when trying to represent fluxes and dynamics of nutrients and other solutes, which are typically controlled by hydrological and biogeochemical processes in the transition zone between GW and SW. I argue that in our quest to understand coupled hydrological and biogeochemical processes and GW dependent ecosystems at the catchment and landscape scales, we needed to revisit the perception of GW and SW as a hydrologic continuum. I will use the example of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) export from a headwater catchment to stress this point and illustrate how rich field data and an integral numerical model can help to refine and improve a simplified conceptual model for catchment-scale DOC export. Finally an outlook will be given on future requirements for adequate monitoring and modeling of coupled GW-SW ecosystems.

ARPHA Conference AbstractsVol. 8
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.