Defining the Geomechanical Operating Limits for Subsurface CO2 Storage

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a critical component of proposed pathways to limit global warming, though considerable upscaling is required to meet emissions reductions targets. Quantifying and managing the risks of fault reactivation is a leading barrier to scaling global CCS projects from current levels of ~40 MtCO2/yr to target levels of several GtCO2/yr because CO2 injection into reservoirs can result in increased pore fluid pressure and temperature changes, which can reduce the strength of rocks and faults, and induce brittle failure. This can result in induced seismicity, whilst hydraulic fracturing of overlying sealing formations could provide pathways for CO2 leakage. Consequently, identifying favourable geomechanical conditions (typically determined through data on pre-injection rock stress, mechanical and elastic properties and pore-fluid pressures) to minimise deformation of reservoirs and seals represents a key challenge in the selection and de-risking of safe and effective sites for CCS projects. Critically however, such geomechanical data are typically spatially limited (i.e. restricted to wells) and mainly consist of pre-injection crustal stress orientation measurements, rather than a full 3D description of the stress tensor and related geomechanical properties. This paper provides a concise review of some of the key geomechanical issues and knowledge gaps (particularly those associated with data availability and limitations) that need to be understood to enable successful reservoir and seal management, and ultimately long-term storage efficacy, for CCS projects. We also highlight recent advances in multi-scale and dimensional geomechanical modelling approaches that can be used to assess sites for the secure storage of CO2, and other gases including hydrogen.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36404/rqml9899
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining the Geomechanical Operating Limits for Subsurface CO2 Storage

Rosalind King, Simon Holford, Scott Mildren, Adam Bailey et al.
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Defining the Geomechanical Operating Limits for Subsurface CO2 Storage

Rosalind King, Simon Holford, Scott Mildren, Adam Bailey, Mojtaba Rajabi
article en

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a critical component of proposed pathways to limit global warming, though considerable upscaling is required to meet emissions reductions targets. Quantifying and managing the risks of fault reactivation is a leading barrier to scaling global CCS projects from current levels of ~40 MtCO2/yr to target levels of several GtCO2/yr because CO2 injection into reservoirs can result in increased pore fluid pressure and temperature changes, which can reduce the strength of rocks and faults, and induce brittle failure. This can result in induced seismicity, whilst hydraulic fracturing of overlying sealing formations could provide pathways for CO2 leakage. Consequently, identifying favourable geomechanical conditions (typically determined through data on pre-injection rock stress, mechanical and elastic properties and pore-fluid pressures) to minimise deformation of reservoirs and seals represents a key challenge in the selection and de-risking of safe and effective sites for CCS projects. Critically however, such geomechanical data are typically spatially limited (i.e. restricted to wells) and mainly consist of pre-injection crustal stress orientation measurements, rather than a full 3D description of the stress tensor and related geomechanical properties. This paper provides a concise review of some of the key geomechanical issues and knowledge gaps (particularly those associated with data availability and limitations) that need to be understood to enable successful reservoir and seal management, and ultimately long-term storage efficacy, for CCS projects. We also highlight recent advances in multi-scale and dimensional geomechanical modelling approaches that can be used to assess sites for the secure storage of CO2, and other gases including hydrogen.

(August 2024)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defining the Geomechanical Operating Limits for Subsurface CO2 Storage — Rosalind King, Simon Holford, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS