Reward Perception, But Not Reward Inequality Is Associated With Increased Dishonesty

Abstract: The present experiment explores the link between perceived unfairness of low rewards for work and propensity for dishonest actions. Participants engaged in a sorting task where they had the opportunity to break rules to increase their rewards while harming a third party. While manipulation of reward unfairness did not significantly increase dishonesty, dissatisfaction with absolute reward levels and the emphasis on proportionality as a moral foundation predicted unethical behavior. These findings have significant implications for understanding the psychological underpinnings of dishonesty and fairness perceptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000570
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reward Perception, But Not Reward Inequality Is Associated With Increased Dishonesty

Marek Vranka, Štěpán Bahník
Social Psychology
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Reward Perception, But Not Reward Inequality Is Associated With Increased Dishonesty

Marek Vranka, Štěpán Bahník
article en

Abstract

Abstract: The present experiment explores the link between perceived unfairness of low rewards for work and propensity for dishonest actions. Participants engaged in a sorting task where they had the opportunity to break rules to increase their rewards while harming a third party. While manipulation of reward unfairness did not significantly increase dishonesty, dissatisfaction with absolute reward levels and the emphasis on proportionality as a moral foundation predicted unethical behavior. These findings have significant implications for understanding the psychological underpinnings of dishonesty and fairness perceptions.

Social PsychologyVol. 56(1)
Prague University of Economics and Business (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.