The Middle Turkic Biblical Ms. Evr. I Bibl. 143 from the first Firkowicz collection. Part I. Linguistic affiliation

The Middle Turkic manuscript stored in the First Firkovicz Collection in the National Library of Russia in Saint Petersburg under accession number Evr. I Bibl. 143 contains a translation of a large portion of the Torah written in the Hebrew script. Two major questions remain to be answered regarding this source. First, in which Turkic language is it written? Second, to which religious and exegetical tradition does it belong? This paper attempts to answer the first question. Existing views on the subject are reviewed in the form of a polemic, and a comparison of the language with Khwarezmian Turkic, Chagatay, Middle Kipchak, Karaim, and Krymchak is offered. The religious affiliation of the translation is discussed in the second part of this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624sl.25.006.21560
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ancient Near East History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Middle Turkic Biblical Ms. Evr. I Bibl. 143 from the first Firkowicz collection. Part I. Linguistic affiliation

Michał Németh
1 citations
Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis
Ancient Near East History
8.27
article

The Middle Turkic Biblical Ms. Evr. I Bibl. 143 from the first Firkowicz collection. Part I. Linguistic affiliation

Michał Németh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Middle Turkic manuscript stored in the First Firkovicz Collection in the National Library of Russia in Saint Petersburg under accession number Evr. I Bibl. 143 contains a translation of a large portion of the Torah written in the Hebrew script. Two major questions remain to be answered regarding this source. First, in which Turkic language is it written? Second, to which religious and exegetical tradition does it belong? This paper attempts to answer the first question. Existing views on the subject are reviewed in the form of a polemic, and a comparison of the language with Khwarezmian Turkic, Chagatay, Middle Kipchak, Karaim, and Krymchak is offered. The religious affiliation of the translation is discussed in the second part of this study.

Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae CracoviensisVol. 142(2)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ancient Near East History
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Middle Turkic Biblical Ms. Evr. I Bibl. 143 from the first Firkowicz collection. Part I. Linguistic affiliation — Michał Németh · Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS