Optimizing Analgesia After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Interpectoral Plane Block Plus Serratus Anterior Plane Block to Erector Spinae Plane Block

<b>Background:</b> Regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly used for pain management in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). We aimed to evaluate whether the combination of interpectoral plane block (IPB) and superficial serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) provides non-inferior postoperative analgesia compared to erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in adult patients undergoing MICS. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial, 40 adult patients scheduled for MICS were allocated to receive either ESPB (<i>n</i> = 20) or a combination of IPB + SAPB (<i>n</i> = 20) prior to surgical incision. All patients received standardized anesthesia. Pain was assessed using the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) during intubation and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 6-48 h postoperatively, following extubation. The primary outcome was the NRS score at 24 h. A non-inferiority margin of 2 NRS points was pre-specified, and non-inferiority was evaluated using between-group differences with 95% confidence intervals. Opioid consumption was recorded via PCA fentanyl and rescue analgesics, converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included extubation time and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). <b>Results:</b> Median 24 h NRS was 3.0 (0-5.0) in the ESPB group and 2.5 (0-5.0) in the IPB + SAPB group. The between-group difference remained within the predefined two-point margin (95% CI: -0.8 to 1.2). Opioid consumption (<i>p</i> = 0.394), extubation time, and PONV incidence were comparable (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). No block-related complications occurred. <b>Conclusions:</b> IPB + SAPB was non-inferior to ESPB for postoperative analgesia in MICS. Despite requiring two injections, it remains an effective alternative. Larger trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113786
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Analgesia After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Interpectoral Plane Block Plus Serratus Anterior Plane Block to Erector Spinae Plane Block

Onur Baran, Makbule Cavidan Arar, Ayhan Şahin, Selami Gürkan et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
article

Optimizing Analgesia After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial Comparing Interpectoral Plane Block Plus Serratus Anterior Plane Block to Erector Spinae Plane Block

Onur Baran, Makbule Cavidan Arar, Ayhan Şahin, Selami Gürkan, Özcan Gür
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Regional anesthesia techniques are increasingly used for pain management in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). We aimed to evaluate whether the combination of interpectoral plane block (IPB) and superficial serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) provides non-inferior postoperative analgesia compared to erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in adult patients undergoing MICS. <b>Methods:</b> In this prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, non-inferiority trial, 40 adult patients scheduled for MICS were allocated to receive either ESPB (<i>n</i> = 20) or a combination of IPB + SAPB (<i>n</i> = 20) prior to surgical incision. All patients received standardized anesthesia. Pain was assessed using the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) during intubation and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 6-48 h postoperatively, following extubation. The primary outcome was the NRS score at 24 h. A non-inferiority margin of 2 NRS points was pre-specified, and non-inferiority was evaluated using between-group differences with 95% confidence intervals. Opioid consumption was recorded via PCA fentanyl and rescue analgesics, converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included extubation time and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). <b>Results:</b> Median 24 h NRS was 3.0 (0-5.0) in the ESPB group and 2.5 (0-5.0) in the IPB + SAPB group. The between-group difference remained within the predefined two-point margin (95% CI: -0.8 to 1.2). Opioid consumption (<i>p</i> = 0.394), extubation time, and PONV incidence were comparable (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). No block-related complications occurred. <b>Conclusions:</b> IPB + SAPB was non-inferior to ESPB for postoperative analgesia in MICS. Despite requiring two injections, it remains an effective alternative. Larger trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(11)
Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.