The Failure and Nightmare of International Development

Objective: This research study critically evaluates Arturo Escobar’s 1995 assertion that the post- 1950s international development project, instead of delivering prosperity, resulted in widespread underdevelopment, exploitation, and oppression. It investigates the extent to which international development, driven by capitalism and globalization, has failed to achieve its stated objectives, particularly in the Global South, using some African countries as case studies for illustration. Method: The study employs a qualitative and critical analytical approach, drawing on a multi- disciplinary review of historical accounts, scholarly literature, policy documents, and real-world case studies focused on African nations. It evaluates the theoretical foundations of development, the structural influence of global economic institutions, and the socioeconomic outcomes of key international policies like Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs). Results: The analysis reveals that international development has often served the interests of Western industrialized countries rather than those of the developing world. Capitalism and globalization, while promising growth, have fostered global inequalities and allowed transnational corporations and institutions such as the IMF and World Bank to impose neoliberal policies that negatively impact local economies and populations. African case studies demonstrate how these dynamics have contributed to increased poverty, weakened local industries, and socio-political instability. Conclusion: This research supports Escobar’s critique that the dominant development paradigm has largely failed to promote equitable and inclusive progress. Instead, it has facilitated colonial-era patterns of dominance and dependency under a neoliberal guise. A fundamental shift that fosters local agency, social justice, and sustainable, context-driven policies over profit-driven globalization is necessary to ensure development becomes truly transformative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54660/.ijmrge.2025.6.3.967-972
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Failure and Nightmare of International Development

Yazeed A Hamoud
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation
International Development and Aid
article

The Failure and Nightmare of International Development

Yazeed A Hamoud
article en

Abstract

Objective: This research study critically evaluates Arturo Escobar’s 1995 assertion that the post- 1950s international development project, instead of delivering prosperity, resulted in widespread underdevelopment, exploitation, and oppression. It investigates the extent to which international development, driven by capitalism and globalization, has failed to achieve its stated objectives, particularly in the Global South, using some African countries as case studies for illustration. Method: The study employs a qualitative and critical analytical approach, drawing on a multi- disciplinary review of historical accounts, scholarly literature, policy documents, and real-world case studies focused on African nations. It evaluates the theoretical foundations of development, the structural influence of global economic institutions, and the socioeconomic outcomes of key international policies like Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs). Results: The analysis reveals that international development has often served the interests of Western industrialized countries rather than those of the developing world. Capitalism and globalization, while promising growth, have fostered global inequalities and allowed transnational corporations and institutions such as the IMF and World Bank to impose neoliberal policies that negatively impact local economies and populations. African case studies demonstrate how these dynamics have contributed to increased poverty, weakened local industries, and socio-political instability. Conclusion: This research supports Escobar’s critique that the dominant development paradigm has largely failed to promote equitable and inclusive progress. Instead, it has facilitated colonial-era patterns of dominance and dependency under a neoliberal guise. A fundamental shift that fosters local agency, social justice, and sustainable, context-driven policies over profit-driven globalization is necessary to ensure development becomes truly transformative.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth EvaluationVol. 6(3)
University for Peace (CR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Failure and Nightmare of International Development — Yazeed A Hamoud · International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS