Treatment Outcomes of Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant global health burden, with elevated intracranial pressure as a major cause of mortality and disability. The timing of decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI is controversial, with limited evidence on whether ultra-early intervention improves survival or neurological outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare survival rates, functional outcomes, and complications between ultra-early (<4 hours) and later decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe TBI, and to identify prognostic factors influencing these outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary neurosurgical center, including 127 adults with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3–8) undergoing decompressive craniectomy between January 2021 and December 2023. Inclusion required age ≥18 years and blunt head trauma; exclusions were hypotension, hypoxia, penetrating injury, whole brain ischemia, or non-survivable comorbidities. Data on demographics, injury characteristics, radiological findings (Marshall CT classification), timing of surgery, and outcomes (modified Rankin Scale) were extracted. Statistical analysis used SPSS version 23.0 with t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Ethical approval was obtained in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Results: Of 127 patients (mean age 49.7 years, 76.4% male), 60 underwent ultra-early surgery. Overall mortality was 68.5%. Favorable outcome rates did not differ significantly between ultra-early and later groups (3.3% vs. 6.0%, p=0.678). Independent predictors of mortality included age >50 (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.52–6.91, p=0.002), GCS ≤5 (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.12–10.6, p<0.001), and Marshall Class 4 CT (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.07–4.48, p=0.031), but not surgical timing. Conclusion: Ultra-early decompressive craniectomy does not significantly improve survival or functional outcomes over later intervention in severe TBI. Clinical decision-making should prioritize patient-specific prognostic factors, emphasizing comprehensive assessment for optimal management and resource allocation in human healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61919/9mm00a66
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Treatment Outcomes of Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Aurangzeb Baber, N. Zaheer Ahmed, Irfan Adil, Abid Langove et al.
Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
article

Treatment Outcomes of Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Aurangzeb Baber, N. Zaheer Ahmed, Irfan Adil, Abid Langove, Nasr Ullah Langove
article en

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a significant global health burden, with elevated intracranial pressure as a major cause of mortality and disability. The timing of decompressive craniectomy for severe TBI is controversial, with limited evidence on whether ultra-early intervention improves survival or neurological outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to compare survival rates, functional outcomes, and complications between ultra-early (<4 hours) and later decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe TBI, and to identify prognostic factors influencing these outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary neurosurgical center, including 127 adults with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3–8) undergoing decompressive craniectomy between January 2021 and December 2023. Inclusion required age ≥18 years and blunt head trauma; exclusions were hypotension, hypoxia, penetrating injury, whole brain ischemia, or non-survivable comorbidities. Data on demographics, injury characteristics, radiological findings (Marshall CT classification), timing of surgery, and outcomes (modified Rankin Scale) were extracted. Statistical analysis used SPSS version 23.0 with t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Ethical approval was obtained in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Results: Of 127 patients (mean age 49.7 years, 76.4% male), 60 underwent ultra-early surgery. Overall mortality was 68.5%. Favorable outcome rates did not differ significantly between ultra-early and later groups (3.3% vs. 6.0%, p=0.678). Independent predictors of mortality included age >50 (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.52–6.91, p=0.002), GCS ≤5 (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.12–10.6, p<0.001), and Marshall Class 4 CT (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.07–4.48, p=0.031), but not surgical timing. Conclusion: Ultra-early decompressive craniectomy does not significantly improve survival or functional outcomes over later intervention in severe TBI. Clinical decision-making should prioritize patient-specific prognostic factors, emphasizing comprehensive assessment for optimal management and resource allocation in human healthcare.

Journal of Health Wellness and Community Research
Bolan University of Medical and Health Sciences (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.