Wszczęcie egzekucji z nieruchomości a przerwa biegu terminu zasiedzenia (art. 123 § 1 pkt 1 k.c. w zw. z art. 175 k.c.). Glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 11 kwietnia 2024 r., II CSKP 856/23

The commented decision of the Supreme Court of 11 April 2024, II CSKP 856/23, concerns the issue of adverse possession of real estate. The commentator criticized the position expressed therein that the interruption of the limitation period for real estate – within the meaning of art. 123 § 1 item 1 of the Civil Code in connection with art. 175 of the Civil Code – occurs by initiating enforcement against the real estate and making an entry about it in the land and mortgage register. He noted that none of these actions is an “offensive action” by the owner taken against the independent possessor of the real estate in order to protect the property right. Only such conduct causes an interruption of the limitation period. Keywords: enforcement against real estate, seizure of real estate, decision on awarding ownership of real estate, adverse possession, interruption of the limitation period