Evaluation of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Histopathology Results in Salivary Gland Masses

<strong>Objective:</strong> The aim of this study was to compare the Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) results with histopathological outcomes in salivary gland masses and to determine the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FNAB. <strong>Methods:</strong> The study included 103 patients who underwent surgery for salivary gland masses between 2019 and 2022. FNAB was performed under ultrasound guidance, and the samples were examined. Preoperative FNAB results were classified as benign, malignant, or nondiagnostic and compared with the postoperative histopathological results. <strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients included in the study, 48 (46.6%) were female and 55 (53.4%) were male. The most frequent FNAB was performed on the parotid gland, and histopathological results were reported as benign in 89 patients and malignant in 14 patients. The sensitivity of FNAB was found to be 80%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 97%. The nondiagnostic result rate was 6.8%. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNAB is a safe, rapid, and cost-effective method for diagnosing salivary gland masses. The study demonstrates that FNAB provides high accuracy in the early detection of malignant tumours. However, false-negative results may occur in low-grade malignant tumours. The results demonstrate that the accuracy of FNAB varies depending on the pathologist’s experience and the quality of sampling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat
Published
2025-05-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26650/tr-ent.2025.1611147
Primary Topic
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Histopathology Results in Salivary Gland Masses

Hati̇ce Karaman, İbrahim Özcan, Nuri Ünsal, Yunus Kantekin et al.
The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and Throat
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Evaluation of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy and Histopathology Results in Salivary Gland Masses

Hati̇ce Karaman, İbrahim Özcan, Nuri Ünsal, Yunus Kantekin, Altan Kaya, Ali̇ Bayram, Mehmet Yaşar, Serap Bulut Çöbden, Esra Dişbudak
article en

Abstract

<strong>Objective:</strong> The aim of this study was to compare the Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) results with histopathological outcomes in salivary gland masses and to determine the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FNAB. <strong>Methods:</strong> The study included 103 patients who underwent surgery for salivary gland masses between 2019 and 2022. FNAB was performed under ultrasound guidance, and the samples were examined. Preoperative FNAB results were classified as benign, malignant, or nondiagnostic and compared with the postoperative histopathological results. <strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients included in the study, 48 (46.6%) were female and 55 (53.4%) were male. The most frequent FNAB was performed on the parotid gland, and histopathological results were reported as benign in 89 patients and malignant in 14 patients. The sensitivity of FNAB was found to be 80%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 97%. The nondiagnostic result rate was 6.8%. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNAB is a safe, rapid, and cost-effective method for diagnosing salivary gland masses. The study demonstrates that FNAB provides high accuracy in the early detection of malignant tumours. However, false-negative results may occur in low-grade malignant tumours. The results demonstrate that the accuracy of FNAB varies depending on the pathologist’s experience and the quality of sampling.

The Turkish Journal of Ear Nose and ThroatVol. 35(2)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.